Hmmm...some feedback from those that still want it on the main screen would be
nice.
de Mike W9MDB
From: David Tiller <dtil...@captechconsulting.com>
To: Black Michael <mdblac...@yahoo.com>; WSJT software development
<wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 3:46 PM
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] A non-technical reason to remove/relocate the audio
slider
Michael,
It doesn't have to remain a gigantic slider - it could be a simple dB spinbox
like the other controls on the graph window. That would actually free up space
on the main window where all the real fun happens.
--David TillerSr. Architect/Lead Consultant | CapTech(804) 304-0638 |
dtil...@captechconsulting.com
On Jul 19, 2017, at 4:30 PM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel
<wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
I agree the placement is misleading...but there really isn't a better place to
put it without some judicious rearranging.Would need to figure out what to do
with the CAT indicator for example.Or maybe sticking it under the Date/Time
might work.Just not a lot of room to work with.
de Mike W9MDB
From: "Laurie, VK3AMA" <_vk3a...@vkdxer.net>
To: WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 3:22 PM
Subject: [wsjt-devel] A non-technical reason to remove/relocate the audio slider
Having the slider immediately adjacent to the level indicator,
regardless of its true function, implies to an uneducated user (hasn't
read the manual or understood group postings) that the two are
associated. It is how most GUIs are presented.
A problem I see all too often, is some users experiencing difficulties
or think there is a defect with their software will post their
questions/findings to non-related Internet forums, QRZ and eHam are the
big ones, looking for answers and support. They don't post to the
correct support group/forum. I see this often with WSJT-X, JTAlert and
JTDX. The usual result is an incorrect or incomplete answer from a user
based on their experience or the perception of how the software works,
often wrong. It is not uncommon to see a long running thread of
exchanges between users exchanging (and reinforcing) the misinformation.
Unless someone comes along and corrects the record, this misinformation
tends to be propagated through Internet searches and word-of-mouth.
None of us like our software being incorrectly maligned due to
misinformation.
IMHO, leaving the slider adjacent to the level meter will lead to an
ongoing public perception among some users that the software is broken.
Especially after a General Release (look at the numerous threads posted
since the 1.8.0-rc1 was posted, people don't read or research old
messages). New users encountering these uncorrected public defect
reports via an Internet search will likely perceive there is a problem
with the software.
That's my 2cents.
de Laurie VK3AMA
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!
http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
