Hi Neil,
but doesn't that mean you have to redo the logic used by the double
click to change the current function from seeing RR73 as a grid, ...
The change in logic is minimal.
I'm also guessing that you would have to make this band specific so its
not used with MS/EME/etc modes which would mess up the normal QSO
there.
No. RR73 is already used sometimes for MS, with no confusion. Anyone
receiving an RR73 knows what it means.
Few (if any) use RR73 for EME. EME operators are seldom in a hurry;
they generally prefer solid, perfectly documented QSOs with every box
separately checked.
You have plenty of people still using WSJT v10 that it would
cause headaches for.
WSJT has no trouble coping with RR73. Why should it?
There are plenty of us who DON'T use RR73 as it doesn't save any time on
the slow modes whatsoever, and its an affectation that does not need to
be formalized as part of the protocol (IMHO).
There's a simple solution: if you don't like it, don't use it! (But
you'd be well advised to be prepared to receive it, sometimes.)
-- 73, Joe, K1JT
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
