Thanks for the good wishes, Morris! I am gradually feeling better...this was my
first "high-dose" flu shot and probably my last! The amount of antigen is four
times a standard flu shot.
Ed, K0KC
k0kc@arrl.nethttp://k0kc.us/
On Friday, September 29, 2017, 2:22:29 PM EDT, Morris Wideman via
wsjt-devel <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
This is where more and better filters would also be useful when the left
screen is full of calls that have nothing to do with your call or QSO. Hope you
get to feeling better Ed.73 Morris wa4mit
On Friday, September 29, 2017, 11:03:39 AM CDT, Ed Wilson via wsjt-devel
<wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
I have been using WSJT-X since its inception and JT65-HF before that. I was
always one of those "bad guys" who checked the Tx=Rx box unless I was trying to
contact a DX station where dozens of others were probably calling him or her
and it made sense to call off-frequency.
Over the past couple of days, I have been trying to train myself to use split
operation most of the time. I am currently on r8140. I have found that when I
respond to a CQ off of the caller's frequency, I frequently do not get an
answer. He or she keeps calling CQ or perhaps responds to someone else. I do
not expect to make contact with everyone I call, but my success rate is way
down with split operation.
I believe that the problem is that my response gets "lost" in the left-hand
window, especially on a busy band. Additionally, people have been conditioned
over many years of operation to look for a response to their CQ in the
right-hand window and may not even glance over to the left-hand window.
Would it be possible to have the right-hand window display stations responding
to a CQ (or others sending my call) rather than calls on the Rx frequency as it
does now? I believe that this would partially address the concerns that some of
us have with the double-click now resulting in split operation. Perhaps there
are disadvantages to this proposal that have not occurred to me yet as I am not
100% today fighting a reaction to a flu shot; if so, start the "flames"
Ed, K0KC
k0kc@arrl.nethttp://k0kc.us/------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!
http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!
http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
