Claude et al, Exactly. That's why this is a development question. The ADIF fields are there, and apparently not being used, or I missed a setting somewhere.
I agree in principle with Karl. Too much automation is not a good thing. But as long as frequency is being logged, it should be done with the correct frequencies. If the WSJT-X developers don't want to deal with it fine. Just say so and I'll continue manual corrections. Not a big deal, but was curious. __________ Dan – K4SHQ -----Original Message----- From: Claude Frantz [mailto:claude.fra...@bayern-mail.de] Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 9:43 AM To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Split frequency logging On 11/22/2017 02:25 PM, Dan Malcolm wrote: Hi Dan & all, > WSJT-X is pretty good at running QSO’s with ‘split’ frequency > operation. JTAlert is essential for smooth QSO tracking and logging. > What I am missing is logging the separate frequencies for a split QSO. > I suspect that most ops don’t track the different Tx and Rx > frequencies, but I do. Perhaps the data manager in me. The ADIF specification defines a FREQ field containing the TX frequency in MHz and an additional FREQ_RX field containing the RX frequency in MHz, in the case of split operation. Best wishes, Claude (DJ0OT) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
