On 19/02/2018 8:35 AM, Bill Somerville wrote:
I am confused about what he issue with the above Z6/S56A callsign is as that is a valid type 2 prefix compound callsign and should be handled reasonably well by the existing source encoding.
Bill,I wonder if the OP was referring JTDX rather than WSJT-X. There were recent reports of Z6 Calls being incorrectly logged as ZA coming from JTDX
From the latest JTDX release notes...
Discarded all changes done to Z6 prefix support: it has been supported in all versions 18.1 and new changes violated WSJT-X protocol.
de Laurie VK3AMA
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
