Charlie:

This is exactly what happened to me after going to 1.9. 

Thanks responding..... I will work on it.

Jim W8CZN


---- char...@sucklingfamily.free-online.co.uk wrote: 
> Hi Jim
> 
> The same happened to me just before the FT8 Dxpedition test, for the first
> time.  In my case this was with 1.9 that has been installed and stable for
> some time.
> 
> I was able to fix it by going to Settings-> Audio and pressing 'Select'
> and browsing to the standard locations (in my case c:/Users/User/AppData/
> Local/WSJT-X/save.
> 
> I don't know why the cannot find path specified warning appeared.
> 
> 73
> 
> Charlie G3WDG
> 
> 
>  > Hi:
> >
> > After the fun of about a thousand Qs and switching to 1.9, I started to
> > get the "cannot find path specified" error message with every cycle.
> >
> > I have attempted to reset "Location" in the Audio Save Directory with no
> > success.
> >
> > Can someone please give me a pointer on how establish the path to direct
> > the wave file.
> >
> > Thanks !!!!
> >
> > Jim W8CZN
> > I have save set to "none"
> > ---- Saku <oh...@sral.fi> wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> This small patch seems to stop duplicate decodes in
> >> BandActivity/UDP/ALL.TEXT  and makes touching "CQ only" to take *effect
> >> from next decode onwards*.
> >>
> >> Just what I tried to describe...
> >>
> >> --
> >> Saku
> >> OH1KH
> >>
> >>
> >> Bill Somerville kirjoitti 06.04.2018 klo 19:43:
> >> > On 06/04/2018 17:39, Bill Somerville wrote:
> >> >> this is not really a defect. If you have "CQ Only" checked then
> >> >> non-CQ decodes are discarded and cannot be recovered. Un-checking the
> >> >> option causes the decoder to redo the decode on the sample buffer.
> >> >> The same applies to checking the "CQ Only" option except that CQ
> >> >> decodes are discarded. If you do not want duplicated UDP Decode
> >> >> messages nor duplicates in the ALL.TXT file then all I can suggest is
> >> >> that you do not use the "CQ Only" option. BTW it is possible that the
> >> >> repeated decode passes may have different results if the Rx audio
> >> >> offset, decode depth, waterfall width, or AP settings have been
> >> changed.
> >> >
> >> > Fixing a critical typo:
> >> >
> >> > this is not really a defect. If you have "CQ Only" checked then non-CQ
> >> > decodes are discarded and cannot be recovered. Un-checking the option
> >> > causes the decoder to redo the decode on the sample buffer. The same
> >> > applies to checking the "CQ Only" option except that *non-* CQ decodes
> >> > are discarded. If you do not want duplicated UDP Decode messages nor
> >> > duplicates in the ALL.TXT file then all I can suggest is that you do
> >> > not use the "CQ Only" option. BTW it is possible that the repeated
> >> > decode passes may have different results if the Rx audio offset,
> >> > decode depth, waterfall width, or AP settings have been changed.
> >> >
> >> > 73
> >> > Bill
> >> > G4WJS.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >
> >> > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> >> > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > wsjt-devel mailing list
> >> > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> > _______________________________________________
> > wsjt-devel mailing list
> > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
> >
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to