Peter,

I use a Mac computer and have observed this same behavior by rc5 on my 
computer. 
_____________________

On Nov 27, 2018, at 9:35 PM, Peter Sumner <vk8...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello Dev team,
 while reading the last batch of posts here, I noticed a reference by another 
that their system appear to jump into JT9 in certain circumstances so while 
pondering what is going on with my RC5 install, I noticed the Red TX marker on 
the waterfall is the size I would expect for JT9 and not the wider one expected 
for JT65 A, B or C. When I do select JT65C I can start to see the RX tone 
marker but all scrunched up together, yet decoding of our local JT65B beacon 
works when I go back to JT65B.

When I select JT9 the RX and TX markers are the expected small complimentry 'u' 
and 'n' shapes, when I switch to JT65 the TX marker is the same narrow one it 
was for JT9.

As best as I can tell the actual decoder seems to be happy but the logic teling 
the Wide graph what to do seems to be confused.

O/S reasonably fresh install of Windows 10 Pro X64, all updates applied

Is it possible for others to please check the behaviour of the JT65 modes 
(VHF/UHF features enabled) ?
Regards,
Peter, vk5pj

> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:17 AM Peter Sumner <vk8...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Dev team,
>   I was asked today about the tone markers in the Wide Graph when using JT65 
> as it would seem in V2.x these have been dropped.  Could not see any mention 
> of this in the release notes but guess it was a development decision, just 
> want to make sure it was not an unexpected outcome?
> 
> A side by side screen capture (1.91 and 2.0 TC5)  is here: 
> http://www.users.on.net/~pedroj/wsjtx/WSJT-JT65.JPG
> 
> Regards,
> Peter vk5pj
> 

_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to