Hi Phil
It says in the WSJT v2 user guide section 7.5 “WSJT-X 2.0 offers no support for 
two nonstandard callsigns to work each other” so this is a well known 
limitation.

I do not understand the logic that WSJT does not give reception reports to PSK 
reporter unless a QRA and callsign exist in a single message whereas all QSOs 
made with my type B callsign are valid without any QRA locator information 
being exchanged at all?

I wonder if anyone else has experienced what I call “callsign hijacking” where 
mid way through a QSO you start transmitting the wrong “other station” 
callsign. The message boxes are all filled correctly yet the wrong callsign 
appears to be transmitted and brings the QSO to a halt. Restarting the program 
and abandoning the QSO seems to be the only way to stop it. Presumably this is 
an unwanted result of using hash codes.

As it stands v2.0.0 does a lot for “normal” callsign holders but is really 
quite tricky if you have a type B callsign.  I have used FT8 a lot whilst 
operating from Australia with simple wire antennas and it has allowed me to 
work around the globe. However, tuning across 17m this evening the band was 
absolutely empty - until I hit 18100 and the S meter almost hit the stops. For 
a weak signal mode there are a lot of powerful stations crowded into that 3kHz 
and I felt sad the popularity of FT8 seems to have emptied the band of SSB 
stations.

Paul G3NJV

Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

________________________________
From: t...@gmx.fr <t...@gmx.fr>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2019 7:26:59 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT Reporting to PSK Reporter

Hi,

Paul, I have the same issue when I use the call ZS1/F5FDV.

Since december last year I was wondering why I get only few reports from 
PSKReporter.
Your post provides a very relevant the explanation, in my opinion.

Reporting went well with revisions prior to 2.0.

It seems consistent with the statement that it is now impossible to make proper 
QSO between two type B stations (see previous posts from me to the group). I 
think that there is a weakness in the coding or decoding of type B call signs. 
Decoding maybe, because reporting of these stations by WSJT-X to PSKReporter do 
no happen.

73,

Phil F5FDV

Envoyé: jeudi 24 janvier 2019 à 03:50
De: "Paul Randall" <paulfrand...@hotmail.com>
À: "wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Objet: [wsjt-devel] WSJT Reporting to PSK Reporter
         Hi, I got this address from the WSJT website. I am new to this group 
and not sure of the protocols. I tried emailing yesterday but am unsure if this 
was received.

I am operating as VK2/G3NJV. After upgrading to v2.0.0 I found reports of my 
transmissions almost disappeared from PSK Reporter. I now get just a handful of 
reports all from stations NOT using WSJT. Most of these come from stations 
using “Red Pitaya FT8 TRX 1.0”. I spoke to Philip Gladstone about this and he 
told me that WSJT does not send reception reports to PSK Reporter unless it 
receives callsign and locator in a single message. It is impossible for me to 
transmit a message like this. Because I have a type B callsign, all that will 
fit in a single message is “CQ VK2/G3NJV”

This seems a particularly harsh outcome for type B callsign holders upgrading 
to v2.0.0. who, like me, are often operating portable stations with makeshift 
antennas where reception reports are extremely valuable. The reports from 
stations using a Red Pitaya are perfectly acceptable and I’m not sure of the 
reasoning behind the current WSJT “callsign + QRA” rule. Would it be possible 
to modify this to allow reception reports for type B callsigns received without 
a QRA?

Many thanks for your attention.
Paul Randall
G3NJV

PS After completing this email I checked the PSK Reporter website again. Sure 
enough there were just 5 reception reports, four from monitors using Red Pitaya 
but also a single report from K1HTV  using WSJT-X v2.0.0 784f75. This is the 
only WSJT reception report seen since 10 December so now I’m not sure what is 
going on!
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list 
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to