I would like to remind everyone that our beloved hobby is NOT the Internet. Whether a fully automated station is permitted or not permitted under the respective country's regulation, removing the operator from control of a transmission (auto-CQ, etc.) degrades the hobby.
Ask yourself this: Why bother doing the hobby if you are willing to relinquish control to some program? Do you want a DXCC award so badly that you are willing to rationalise the thought of using auto-CQ? 73 de N4FWD On Sun, Mar 31, 2019, 5:25 AM Georg <[email protected]> wrote: > Why not. Amateur Radio was supposed to be experimental. > > > Am 31.03.2019 um 00:08 schrieb Jim Shorney <[email protected]>: > > > > > > And this helps improve one's skill as an operator HOW? > > > > 73 > > > > -Jim > > NU0C > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 30 Mar 2019 13:53:39 -0700 > > Al Pawlowski <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I do not have a problem with an auto-cq per se. Getting outraged before > it’s been tried, or is causing an actual problem, seems to be "putting the > cart before the horse" to me. > >> > >> Personally, I would not mind being able to tell my radio “Alexa, get me > a bora bora QSL” - maybe using “callsign/AI”. Now, that would be > interesting automation, maybe, a real innovation and, maybe, not too far > off. > >> > >> > >> Al Pawlowski, K6AVP > >> Los Osos, CA USA > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > wsjt-devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel >
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
