On 28/07/2019 21:23, Bill Somerville wrote:
... snip
fully supports replying to CQ calls with a *Tx3 message rather than
using the possibly redundant Tx2* message. I don't think it should be
your choice to demand a grid from your QSO partner unless you really
need it, in which case you can ask for it.
snip
What's you opinion on using an RR73 message to finalize a QSO? I ask
because many stations like to shorten QSOs by a whole Tx and Rx period
by combining starting *with a Tx3 reply* and finishing with an RR73
message.
snip ...
Corrections below, I blame a w/e with a head cold and IOTA operating for
my errors :(
Tx2 -> Tx1
Tx3 ->Tx2
73
Bill
G4WJS.
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
