Thanks Bill: Thanks for the speedy reply!
I did try 2.1 for MSK144, but you may recall that I was getting application crashes. We thought that this might be due to QT (I think it was), but I was able to run 2.1 and FT8 and FT4 just fine. MSK144 would cause the crash instantly. I went back to 2.0.1 due to this. I did see a couple of crashes (the QT bug) for FT8/4 but they were rare, whereas it was always “instanced crash” with MSK144. Kevin > On Aug 27, 2019, at 8:33 AM, Bill Somerville <g4...@classdesign.com> wrote: > > On 27/08/2019 16:18, Kevin McQuiggin wrote: >> Hi All: >> >> Just curious as to whether there’s a update as to a fix for the few problems >> we MacOS users had with (for example) MSK144 on the released 2.1. >> >> No pressure of course (I’m a software developer myself), just wondering if >> there’s a 2.1.1 in the works or anything! >> >> That said, if there’s anything I can do to help then let me know. >> >> 73, >> >> Kevin VE7ZD/K7MCQ > > Hi Kevin, > > fixes are in place for the major known macOS issues with WSJT-X, the release > should be soon but I am not able to say exactly when soon is. With respect to > MSK144, there is little (possibly none) difference between v2.0.1 and v2.1.0 > so using the older version is an optimal workaround for that mode. > > 73 > Bill > G4WJS. > > > > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
