Hi Dave,
I don't think you have sent us any .wav files for EME QSOs on 6 meters.
It would be very useful to have some indication of your on-the-air
experience with Q65 for 6m EME.
Have you at least studied the example files for 6m EME mentioned in the
Quick-Start Guide to Q65? Or read the "Sensitivity Comparison of JT65A
and Q65-60A"? (A copy is posted here:
https://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/JT65A_And_Q65.pdf.)
What conclusions has your 6m EME experience lead you to draw concerning
Q65? If your conclusions differ from ours, can you explain why?
-- 73, Joe, K1JT
On 2/9/2021 9:36 AM, David Schmocker wrote:
GA/GM Bill and all of the developers,
_Thank you so much_ for all the team is doing.
Can Short-Hand messages be added for Q65A (used at 6m) also please?
It’s helpful to have those single-tone messages Q65A at 6m EME because
I have had at least one 6m EME JT65A weak signal QSO where the decoder
didn’t decode the SH message, yet I was able to visibly see a ‘paint
splash’ (partial trace) at the right frequencies knowing that SH message
that was being sent so I could visually decode this. Also, if I go on
a DXpedition (which I plan to), [my apologies in advance this is going
to open a hornet’s nest], I am interested in working more stations, not
spending time distinguishing between level-based reports. Perhaps
my HF background where contesters give “599” no matter what colors this
request. With EME, SH messages help. Having the choice of SH or not
gives the level-sensitive or SH option.
I appreciate your consideration. Thank you! Very 73,
Dave KJ9I
(flames if any to be sent to me directly not to the list please)
*From: *Bill Somerville <g4...@classdesign.com>
*Reply-To: *WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
*Date: *Tuesday, February 9, 2021 at 5:00 AM
*To: *<wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
*Subject: *Re: [wsjt-devel] #Feature request. 2.4.0
On 09/02/2021 03:54, Hattori, Yoshihisa wrote:
Hi all.
I am testing Q65 and realized that we are missing Short hand
indicator on waterfall display, which is provided for JT65. (three
yellow lines suggesting the RO/RRR/73 tones.) While less Q65/QRA64
users are using shorthand, it is good to have those since Sh will
not be decoded and users need to visually identify the signal. Can
you please implement it?
De JO1LVZ/Hatt
Hi Hatt-san,
the single tone short code markers are shown for sub-modes C or wider.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
