Perhaps some do, perhaps I do. However that in no way negates my reason for liking the DF axix(sic). It is useful to me because of prior experience. Especially with weak signals which I see a lot of on 50MHz and to some extent 432MHz where I will try with single yagi 100W on Q65. I just find the DF axis a lot more intuitive. I CAN do without but would like to have the choice. It is not a criticism but a user request.
Regards Conrad PA5Y -----Original Message----- From: Don Hawbaker <donhawba...@comcast.net> Sent: 03 November 2021 12:46 To: WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Cc: Conrad PA5Y <g0...@g0ruz.com> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] DF Axix Don’t most operators use split VFO tuning? Sent from my iPad > On Nov 3, 2021, at 7:34 AM, Conrad PA5Y via wsjt-devel > <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > Hello all. > > I really miss the DF axis on the waterfall when operating EME. I know that > the doppler is shown in the Astronomical data window but my brain is tuned > to using DF in the waterfall, could it be added based upon my TX frequency? > For instance if I am using 1500Hz Q65-60B and I know that my sked partner is > +542 Hz I find it much easier to place my cursor at + 542Hz rather than > calculate 2042Hz, especially when I am tired. I would really like the option. > > Can you consider it please? > > I made some recordings of Q65-60B at the weekend on 432 EME. I will upload > the relevant ones later this week. > > Regards > > Conrad PA5Y > > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
