Thanks Reino but it's been changed then and not updated in the User Guide. I say this because I been using WSJT for a very long time (since 2001) and have never seen this behavior before 2.5.4. If it has been changed I'll just turn Enable AP off, problem solved.
Oh I did see it in the RTTY Roundup but dismissed it and moved on since it was a contest.
Fred
N2XK
On Jan 26, 2022 10:01 AM, Reino Talarmo via wsjt-devel <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>The problem was that a signal decoded on 80M. I replied with a -18 SNR but when the station replied with a R-13 it had the a priori code ? a3 after it. WSJT-X didn't advance to the RR73 but instead sent the -18 report again. I then received another R-13 ? a3 and then R-13 ? a2 with WSJT-X not advancing to the RR73 both times.
The next report was R-13 but no a priori code after it and WSJT-X advanced to the RR73.
If you have any further questions please let me know.
Hi Fred,
I assume that what you saw is by design. It is left for the operator to decide, whether he is happy with the ? a2 addition or not. You could have hit the Tx 4 button on the Now row to send RR73 as you we happy.
73, Reino OH3mA
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
