The vote for proposing termination of the WSRP4J Incubator podling has passed 
with 19 +1 votes (8 binding Portals PMC Members),
no 0 votes and 1 -1 (non-binding and without arguments provided) vote.

The next step is to send the proposed termination up for vote on the Apache 
Incubator itself.

Regards,

Ate


On 04/09/2010 12:01 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
Dear Portals PMC and Portals community members,

The WSRP4J incubator project has been dormant for several years already.
The last commit dates back almost 2 years ago, the last emails send to
the user/dev mailing list even longer than that.

An important activity blocker for the Portals committers has been the
unclear situation with the possible IP issue.
That issue has finally been addressed sometime last year and no longer
holds a lock on further progress for the project.

However, although there is known interest in a proper WSRP
implementation within Apache Portals, especially when integrated with
the Jetspeed-2 Portal, it looks like the WSRP4J project itself lost its
momentum, its active committers and its community.

The facts are: the current WSRP4J code base is now too outdated: based
on also outdated Pluto 1.x and targeting the WSRP v1.0 spec while the
WSRP v2.0 spec is available already for almost 2 years now.

If a proper WSRP implementation is wished for, it should now implement
the v2.0 spec and should be easy to integrate with (at least) current
Jetspeed-2 Portal. Trying to revive the WSRP4J project or even just
reusing the outdated code-base for that purpose no longer makes sense.
More likely we'll start writing a new WSRP (v2.0) producer from scratch
within the Jetspeed-2 project itself, and a generic WSRP consumer
portlet application at Portals Applications.

As the Mentors of the WSRP4J project haven't been active in a long time
either, the Portals PMC as Sponsor of WSRP4J has taken over their
responsibilities.

Therefore I'm asking the Portals PMC to VOTE for proposing the
termination of the WSRP4J podling to the Incubator PMC.

This Vote is open for the next 72 hours.

Please cast your vote:

[ ] +1 for termination of WSRP4J
[ ] 0 for Don't care
[ ] -1 for No, please keep it alive (do provide solid arguments why)

With kind regards,

Ate Douma




Reply via email to