[+1] support only the OASIS V1.0 specs and the relevant namespaces. [+1] add the provisional namespaces for the upcoming version
On 8/30/05, Werner Dittmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All, > > while looking at the new OASIS WSS specs and the new functionality > described I figured out that we have to deal with new namespace > URIs again. The namespace URIs shown in the specs are provisional > URIs - they will change for the real finished version of the specs. > > Currently we provide some backward compatibility for old > WSS specs. This is cumbersome and error prone. In addition it is not > fully implemented because some backward compatibility issues > are not really solved. When we are going to introduce new > namespace URIs we will get even more problems. Also this > backward compatibility complicates the code. I would like to > get rid of these code elements. We should point out that these > old namespaces were _never_ a real standard. > > I would propose that for the next version we > - support only the OASIS V1.0 specs and the relevant namespaces. > - add the provisional namespaces for the upcoming version > > After the next version of the WSS specs is finished, we do one > release with the provisional namespaces and another release (with > a new release number) with the then fixed namespace URIs. Doing > so we could save a lot of coding while retaining some > backward compatibility using a n-1 release. > > Any ideas? Anyone around that requires the old namespaces? > > Regards, > Werner > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/ - Oxygenating The Web Service Platform --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
