Werner: I can't find the xml-sec thread that discussed this. Do you have a direct ref?
> ... > Using xpath transformation is always one order the magnitude slower. Slower than using fragment refs? This statement seems unfair. What Xpath engine could possibly be this slow?? > ... > And, according to Raul's statement: when modifying code, > adding new features etc we shall be carefull not to use XPath :-) That is only true because some Xpaths look complex. Simple, direct, Xpaths are quite useful in that they are immediately axiomatic. And let's not forget the whole wsu:Id/Id/ID crapola! :o See 8.2 in [1] for discussion on the occasional need to use Xpath. Thanks Hans [1] http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/BasicSecurityProfile-1.0.html > > Regards, > Werner > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
