Now we have a new processor to process unreferenced
BinarySecurityToken elements in WSS4J. Therefore this exception cannot
occur. Next version of rampart will depend on the next release of
WSS4J which will contain this fix.

If you can provide a test case that simulate this issue we can run it
against the latest build and test it.

Thanks,
Ruchith

On 8/9/07, Ford, Jennifer M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is the Unknown Element: BinarySecurityToken fixed in the most recent
> build?  I have to vet packages that I use through our security team, and
> they're not quick about it, so I tend to stick to actual releases.  It's
> worth it if that's a known bug that has been fixed, but I would hate to
> introduce other errors since it's just a nightly build rather than an
> actual release of the product.
>
> Checking your other suggestions now as well.
>
> Thanks for your response,
> Jennifer
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ruchith Fernando [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 4:08 AM
> To: Ford, Jennifer M.
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: WSSJ/Rampart Question
>
> Hi,
>
>
> On 8/9/07, Ford, Jennifer M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> > I was referred here from the Axis2 user group.  I am currently trying
> > to add WS-Security to an existing web service
> (AsymmetricBinding/Signature
> > Only) using Apache AXIS2 with Rampart.   There's a sample in the
> rampart
> > distribution that theoretically illustrates how to do this, so I
> > started with the policy.xml and service.xml files from that and
> > attempted to add this to my service code, which was autogenerated
> using WSDL2Java.
> >
> > I've been unable to get this working, and I have run out of ideas.
> > Has anyone actually used Rampart policy files to successfully provide
> > certificate-based authentication, and if so, would you mind sharing
> > your policy.xml file?
>
> Were you able to get the sample in rampart working? And can you explain
> the problem that you ran into in trying to use this with the generated
> service?
>
> >
> > Also:
> >
> > I am seeing the following error in the logs:
> > 2007-08-08 15:51:56,983 DEBUG org.apache.ws.security.WSSecurityEngine
> > - Unknown Element: BinarySecurityToken
> > http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-sec
> > ex
> > t-1.0.xsd
> >
> > That seems like probable cause for this to fail.  I looked up that
> > error on Google, and I see a lot of references to XML Pretty Printing
> > (which I now have disabled in my client axis2.xml, although it does
> > not appear to have made a difference in the output) and most of those
> > messages were using Axis 1.3, not Axis2 as I am using.
>
> Can you please try this with the latest Axis2 release candidate (RC3)
> [1] and Rampart nightlies [2].
>
> >
> > The other thing I am struggling with are the X509 token types and the
> > decryption algorithm.  Is it possible to find that information on the
> > certificate itself?  I was unable to find it, but I am thinking if I
> > were wrong that would be another reason why my signature validation
> > would fail.
>
> The decryption and the token types are not available in the the results
> after processing the "wsse:Security" header.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Ruchith
>
> 1. http://people.apache.org/~deepal/axis2/1.3-RC3/
> 2. http://people.apache.org/dist/rampart/nightly/
> >
> > Thanks so much for your time,
> >
> > Jennifer Ford
> > Energy Management Systems
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> www.ruchith.org
> www.wso2.org
>


-- 
www.ruchith.org
www.wso2.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to