I think SAML support in WSS4J needs to be rethought, before proceeding, probably in close consultation with the OpenSAML team (if I understand things correctly, version 1 of these libraries is not currently supported).

In any event, I think it's not on the block for 1.5.5, but should be considered as part of 2.0.

-Fred

On Oct 16, 2008, at 12:58 PM, George Stanchev wrote:

On the bottom of WSS-124:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-124?page=com.atlassian.jira.pl
ugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel

there is a comment by Glen Mazza asking if WSS4J can move to OpenSAML
2.0. If it is decided to do so, the JDK 1.3 support question
is mute since OpenSAML 2.0 requires JDK 1.5.

George Stanchev

-----Original Message-----
From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 10:44 AM
To: Fred Dushin; wss4j-dev
Subject: RE: WSS4J-1.5.5


Sounds good. There are currently 5 open issues left to be fixed for
1.5.5:

WSS-140 - I committed a patch for this
WSS-149 - ditto
WSS-145 - A patch is proposed for this issue
WSS-124 - Mostly done, bar opensaml. Not a show-stopper at any rate.
WSS-143 - No consensus reached on this yet, not a show-stopper either.

The only other issue I can think of is that unresolved debate we had on
whether JDK 1.3 is supported or not. My opinion is that it is not, and
that we should release note it.

Colm.

-----Original Message-----
From: Fred Dushin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 October 2008 18:36
To: wss4j-dev
Subject: WSS4J-1.5.5

We'd like to spin a release of WSS4J 1.5.5, in anticipation of some
CXF releases and other products built on top of CXF.

Would folks here be amenable to the same sort of RC process we used
for the 1.5.4 release (hopefully with fewer wrinkles :).  I'd be happy
to start the branch and build RC1, once we decide on the remaining
issues to address for 1.5.5.

Enclosed is a PDF snapshot of the current open and closed bug tagged
for 1.5.5 (Apologies for the format -- I can't seem to extract the
data in text form).  If there are any others that people feel should
be addressed and can be in short order, please give a hollar.

Thanks,
-Fred

encl:

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
**********************************************************************


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to