Arthur, just see 31compatibility plugin in datatools downloads - it contents 3.2 navigator
ps i am Haris Peco, no Harris On Saturday 28 January 2006 10:53 pm, Arthur Ryman wrote: > Harris, > > I didn't know about that. > > Chuck - you're the navigator expert. Have you looked at it? > > Arthur Ryman, > IBM Software Group, Rational Division > > blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/ > phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 > assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 > fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 > mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Haris Peco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 01/28/2006 09:45 AM > Please respond to > "General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." > > > To > "General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." > <[email protected]> > cc > > Subject > Re: [wtp-dev] Eclipse 3.1.1 & WTP 1.5 > > > > > > > Arthur, > there is navigator compatibility plugin in datatools project > do you use it ? > On Saturday 28 January 2006 04:55 am, Arthur Ryman wrote: > > Marshall, > > > > The new Common Navigator is 3.2 only. > > > > Maybe Innoopract will do a backport of WTP 1.5 to Eclipse 3.1.2? Ask > > Jochen Krause. > > > > Arthur Ryman, > > IBM Software Group, Rational Division > > > > blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/ > > phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 > > assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 > > fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 > > mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > Marshall Culpepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 01/27/2006 06:56 PM > > Please respond to > > "General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." > > > > > > To > > [email protected] > > cc > > > > Subject > > [wtp-dev] Eclipse 3.1.1 & WTP 1.5 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey everyone... I read the thread about a month back mentioning the fact > > > that WTP 1.5 will be solely based on Eclipse 3.2. I was curious what > > components are requiring what functionality of Eclipse 3.2, and if it > was > > at all possible to minimize that dependency. > > > _______________________________________________ > wtp-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev > > _______________________________________________ wtp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
