Hi Arthur,
Under the Client changes in the doc, i have mentioned that
"Existing IValidator api will be used if not implemented, and will not use Jobs."
since the current adaptors use IValidator interface, the above statement implies that there would be no breakage.
Thanks
Neeraj Agrawal
| Arthur Ryman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/31/2006 07:55 AM
|
|
Neeraj,
I had a quick look at your document. Can you place add a paragraph on the impact of this proposed change to adopters? Will this break existing code? What migration steps are required? Thx.
Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division
blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Neeraj Agrawal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/30/2006 05:18 PM
|
|
The document in the following link captures various requirements and design for the enhancements proposed for the
Validation framework. You can also find links to the bugzillas there, which were opened for desired enhancements and are
good place to provide your feedback.
http://www.eclipse.org/webtools/jst/components/j2ee/proposals/ValidatorFramework.xml
Please provide your feedback.
Thanks
Neeraj Agrawal
J2EE Tooling
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
_______________________________________________ wtp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
