David, I wanted to bring up that the preview server, has a direct plugin dependancy on javax.servlet and we are currently setting the requirements as [2.5, 2.6). I didn't see javax.servlet being mentioned anywhere directly, so I am still in doubt whether there is an impact here or not. But I am assuming no at this point.
Best Regards, -- -- Mr. Angel Vera Server Tools Developer E-Mail: arv...@ca.ibm.com Tel: 905-413-5919 ----- Those who think that something is impossible, should not interfere with those who are willing to do it. - Angel Vera From: David M Williams <david_willi...@us.ibm.com> To: wtp-dev@eclipse.org Date: 03/31/2010 09:12 PM Subject: [wtp-dev] Who needs javax.servlet.jsp 2.1? Sent by: wtp-dev-boun...@eclipse.org Anyone? If so, there's a few issues to work out and test, etc. 1. The bundle in orbit was "split up" from what 2.0 used to be. So to "get it all" we'll need to get several new bundles. For details, see http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/orbit-dev/msg01739.html I'll need you experts (Nitin?, Raghu?) to tell me what you need (all? none?) 2. Currently we get javax.servlet.jsp "for free" from the platform, and do not reship it, per se. I do not think the platform plans to move up to 2.1, so we'd have to reship. So, we've have to figure out which feature should include it ... jsp? jsf? both? 3. more/new CQs should be open to be sure we document all uses of all related bundles. 4. I think some of our bundles use "require bundle" and some "import package". We should all "import package", I believe. I don't think we can change anything this week, but I'll soon promoted an Orbit I-build, so developers can get the bundles to experiment/test if that helps with any of the above decisions. Thanks, _______________________________________________ wtp-dev mailing list wtp-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
_______________________________________________ wtp-dev mailing list wtp-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
