Let me clarify that I am not suggesting to move the tomcat server out of the WTP project. All I am saying is we'd like to expose the new server adapters via the discovery mechanism.
Regards,
Elson
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Elson Yuen, P.Eng.
RAD and WebSphere Server Tools Architect
IBM Toronto Lab
Tel: (905) 413-2689, T/L: 313-2689
From: Tim deBoer/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
To: "General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues."
<wtp-dev@eclipse.org>,
Date: 11/07/2013 08:43 AM
Subject: Re: [wtp-dev] Tomcat 8 and TomEE support
Sent by: wtp-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
This has been WTP's policy for several years, and nobody is suggesting
otherwise. I assume this was just paranoia around Elson's choice of words.
Tim
Inactive hide details for Mike Milinkovich ---05/11/2013 06:03:34 PM---A
big +1 to that, with a particular tip of the hat to thMike Milinkovich
---05/11/2013 06:03:34 PM---A big +1 to that, with a particular tip of the
hat to the notion of supporting popular open source s
From: Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkov...@eclipse.org>
To: wtp-dev@eclipse.org, "'General discussion of project-wide or
architectural issues.'" <wtp-dev@eclipse.org>,
Date: 05/11/2013 06:03 PM
Subje Re: [wtp-dev] Tomcat 8 and TomEE support
ct:
Sent wtp-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
by:
A big +1 to that, with a particular tip of the hat to the notion of
supporting popular open source servers like Tomcat out of the box. Last
time I checked, Tomcat was an Apache project, not "vendor specific".
From: Konstantin Komissarchik
Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2013 5:55 PM
To: 'General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues.'
Reply To: General discussion of project-wide or architectural
issues.
Subject: Re: [wtp-dev] Tomcat 8 and TomEE support
While decoupling of WTP from individual server adapters is great, we should
not be pushing server adapter maintainers away from Eclipse Foundation, if
that?s where the maintainers would like to develop and host a particular
adapter. This is especially true for adapters with long history of active
development at Eclipse Foundation, like the Tomcat adapter. The key goals
is decoupling of adapter schedules from WTP schedule and providing uniform
access to adapters via adapter discovery, but none of those goals actually
require moving adapter development somewhere else. Tomcat adapter could be
split off as a separate project under server tools (provides release
schedule independence) and published on eclipse.org for adapter discovery.
- Konstantin
From: wtp-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:wtp-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On
Behalf Of Elson Yuen
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2013 2:32 PM
To: General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues.
Cc: wtp-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
Subject: Re: [wtp-dev] Tomcat 8 and TomEE support
In general, our direction is to move away to from shipping individual
server adapters directly within WTP. We are pushing for all vendor
specific server adapters to provide externally via the "Download additional
server adapters" link. Therefore, if you happens to be creating a new
server adapter for TomEE, it should be exposed via the downloadable server
adapter. See the plugin org.eclipse.wst.server.discovery for providing
additional server adapter.
Regards,
Elson
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Elson Yuen, P.Eng.
RAD and WebSphere Server Tools Architect
IBM Toronto Lab
Tel: (905) 413-2689, T/L: 313-2689
Inactive hide details for Larry Isaacs ---11/05/2013 04:06:55 PM---Hi Fred,
With respect to Tomcat-8 support, it is on my to-doLarry Isaacs
---11/05/2013 04:06:55 PM---Hi Fred, With respect to Tomcat-8 support, it
is on my to-do list including creating a BZ entry. Th
From: Larry Isaacs <larry.isa...@sas.com>
To: "General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <
wtp-dev@eclipse.org>,
Date: 11/05/2013 04:06 PM
Subject: Re: [wtp-dev] Tomcat 8 and TomEE support
Sent by: wtp-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
Hi Fred,
With respect to Tomcat-8 support, it is on my to-do list including creating
a BZ entry. The problem is I?m back to struggling to finding enough cycles
to get something finished and committed. I have done some initial work
that needs a little clean up before it is ready to commit. The big unknown
is the ?Serve Modules without Publishing? feature, as they have made major
changes to how resources are handled in Tomcat 8. That will likely have to
come later. It?s unclear whether I will get the initial work committed for
3.6.0M3. I have some extra vacation scheduled around Thanksgiving, so I
should be able to get it into 3.6.0M4 if not in M3.
Cheers,
Larry
From: wtp-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:wtp-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On
Behalf Of Fred Bricon
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2013 1:40 PM
To: General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues.
Subject: [wtp-dev] Tomcat 8 and TomEE support
Hi,
I vaguely remember reading something, somewhere, about a Tomcat 8 support
work-in-progress. I couldn't find any related BZ ticket though. What's the
status on that matter?
There's one request[1] to add TomEE to the list of supported servers. Do
you have any plans on adding that to Luna?
Thanks,
Fred
{1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=387733
--
"Have you tried turning it off and on again" - The IT Crowd
_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
<<inline: graycol.gif>>
<<inline: 31396926.gif>>
_______________________________________________ wtp-dev mailing list wtp-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
