Agreed. Some of the current deletions are a bit debatable, and the semantic versioning has gotten a bit lost. As a basic primer, I'd suggest we start following these rules: http://semver.org/
Charley Baker Lead Developer, Watir, http://watir.com On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Bret Pettichord <[email protected]> wrote: > I know there is a strong desire to make a release that drops support for > several obsolete features. > > Makes sense, but if we do that we should call the release 1.7.0 rather than > 1.6.x. It would also be great if the prior 1.6.x release included warnings > for the deprecated features. > > Bret > > -- > Bret Pettichord > Lead Developer, Watir, www.watir.com > > Blog, www.io.com/~wazmo/blog > Twitter, www.twitter.com/bpettichord > > > _______________________________________________ > Wtr-development mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development > _______________________________________________ Wtr-development mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development
