On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Hugh McGowan <[email protected]> wrote:

> Also Jarmo, is there a reason we're hard-coding the watirspec to a change
> number? Seems like we'd be better off to just let watirspec:init get the
> latest. I'm working through the IE9 issues now so between updating tests
> and adding some code changes we should be able to get IE8 and IE9 to the
> same level of support.


I have understood that the point with git submodules is to have same
version for everyone. I'm not sure though.

Seeing Button#click to fail for you make sure you're using latest Sinatra.
I was having failures with tests which were accessing
http://localhost:2000with older Sinatra since newer Sinatra has
"public_folder" as an option for
static content instead of "public" and WatirSpec uses "public_folder" as an
option.

Thanks for the work with IE9! Seeing IE9 failures i'm thinking that you
need to add new guard for IE9 so you could use "not_compliant_on" and
"deviates_on" guards in specs.

Jarmo
_______________________________________________
Wtr-development mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development

Reply via email to