RubyGems.org doesn't report a license for your gem.  This is because it is not 
specified in the [gemspec](http://docs.rubygems.org/read/chapter/20#license) of 
your last release.

via e.g.

    spec.license = 'MIT'
    # or
    spec.licenses = ['MIT', 'GPL-2']

Including a license in your gemspec is an easy way for rubygems.org and other 
tools to check how your gem is licensed.  As you can imagine, scanning your 
repository for a LICENSE file or parsing the README, and then attempting to 
identify the license or licenses is much more difficult and more error prone. 
So, even for projects that already specify a license, including a license in 
your gemspec is a good practice. See, for example, how [rubygems.org uses the 
gemspec to  display the rails gem license](https://rubygems.org/gems/rails).

There is even a [License Finder gem](https://github.com/pivotal/LicenseFinder) 
to help companies/individuals ensure all gems they use meet their licensing 
needs. This tool depends on license information being available in the gemspec. 
 This is an important enough issue that *even Bundler now generates gems with a 
default 'MIT' license*.

I hope you'll consider specifying a license in your gemspec. If not, please 
just close the issue with a nice message. In either case, I'll follow up. 
Thanks for your time!

Appendix:

If you need help choosing a [license](http://opensource.org/licenses) (sorry, I 
haven't checked your readme or looked for a license file), GitHub has created a 
[license picker tool](http://choosealicense.com/).  Code without a license 
specified defaults to 'All rights reserved'-- denying others all rights to use 
of the code.
Here's a [list of the license names I've found and their 
frequencies](https://github.com/bf4/gemproject/blob/master/license_usage.csv)

p.s. In case you're wondering how I found you and why I made this issue, it's 
because I'm collecting stats on gems (I was originally looking for download 
data) and decided to collect license metadata,too, and [make issues for 
gemspecs not specifying a license as a public service 
:)](https://github.com/bf4/gemproject/issues/1). See the previous link or my 
[blog post about this project for more 
information](http://www.benjaminfleischer.com/2013/07/12/make-the-world-a-better-place-put-a-license-in-your-gemspec/).


---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/watir/watir-rails/issues/6
_______________________________________________
Wtr-development mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development

Reply via email to