-------------------------
Via Workers World News Service
Reprinted from the April 5, 2001
issue of Workers World newspaper
-------------------------

U.S ARMS SALES THREATEN CHINA

By Sarah Sloan

At the end of a week-long visit to the U.S., Chinese Vice 
Premier Qian Qichen, China's top foreign policy official, 
warned that U.S. sales of sophisticated weapons to Taiwan 
could lead to a sharpening of conflict between the U.S. and 
China.

Speaking to a lunch of 300 business people and foreign 
policy experts, Qian said, "If weapons were sold to that 
region [Taiwan], it would be like adding fuel to the flame. 
... There is already a spark there. If you pour oil and fuel 
over this spark, the spark would turn into a great flame. 
... We don't want to see the flame of war there."

In the first meetings between the Bush administration and a 
senior Chinese official, Qian met with George W. Bush, 
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of State Colin 
Powell, Vice President Dick Cheney and other Bush 
administration officials.

The main impetus for these meetings is the annual sale of 
U.S. weapons to Taiwan, negotiated in secret based on 
unofficial ties. These sales are a violation of the 1972 
Shanghai Communique signed between then-President Richard 
Nixon and the Chinese government. In this agreement, the 
U.S. recognized the sovereignty of the People's Republic of 
China over Taiwan.

Under consideration for sale are, among other hardware, four 
guided missile destroyers armed with cruise missiles. The 
destroyers are equipped with AEGIS, a ship-based system for 
detecting and shooting down incoming missiles.

This system could be built into a theater-based National 
Missile Defense. Bush will make the decision next month as 
to whether the sale will be made.

China's cause for concern includes a more "hawkish" position 
taken by the Bush administration. While Clinton spoke of 
China as a potential "strategic partner," Bush characterizes 
China as a "strategic competitor."

While there may be a tactical difference within the U.S. 
government between more hard-line militarists who want to 
sell the AEGIS system and more, and the "moderates" who 
favor integrating China into the world economy, their 
objective is the same. They seek to dismantle the socialist 
economic system and return China to a neocolonial status.

NEW ARMS RACE THREATENED

During his visit, Qian spoke of "friendly relations and 
cooperation" between the U.S. and China, but he also warned 
that the decision to sell the AEGIS would mark a "very 
serious" setback in relations.

Chinese President Jiang Zemin echoed this sentiment when, on 
the day that Qian returned to China, he told the Washington 
Post that the sale of the AEGIS would be "very detrimental 
to China-U.S. relations. ... The more weapons you sell, the 
more we will prepare ourselves in terms of our national 
defense. This is logical."

Jiang also said that the U.S. leaders "think their own 
political system should be applied to every corner of the 
globe. That is a very wrong idea, and the idea itself is 
very undemocratic. ... If the 1.2 billion [people in China] 
can get enough to eat and have proper clothing and shelter, 
that would be a great contribution China has made to the 
world. ... And so in the meantime, it is also a contribution 
to bringing about stability in the whole of Asia and the 
wider world."

China's military spending is 5 percent that of the U.S., one-
third that of Japan and less than half that of England.

- END -

(Copyright Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to 
copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but 
changing it is not allowed. For more information contact 
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] For subscription info send message to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.workers.org)





------------------
This message is sent to you by Workers World News Service.
To subscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Send administrative queries to  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to