-------------------------
Via Workers World News Service
Reprinted from the May 17, 2001
issue of Workers World newspaper
-------------------------

AFTER 21-DAY OCCUPATION: 
ELITE HARVARD YIELDS TO WORKER/STUDENT SOLIDARITY

By Leslie Feinberg

After 21 days of occupying Harvard President Neil L. 
Rudenstine's office, students emerged on May 8 to the roar 
of drumbeats, cheers, whistles and applause of more than 
1,000 workers, students, faculty and community supporters.

The protest is a militant chapter in an already three-year-
long campaign by students to win a living wage--$10.25 an 
hour plus benefits--for Harvard's most impoverished 
employees.

The bold student occupation at Harvard--the General Motors 
of academia--captured the attention of the university, the 
city and the country. It recalled the militant sit-down 
strikes of the 1930s. And the Tent City set up by supporters 
outside Mass Hall brought back memories of the encampments 
of the unemployed in the same struggle era.

The 21-day Harvard student protest--believed to be the 
longest building occupation in the university's history--
wrested concessions from the bosses of this corporate 
empire.

University officials finally agreed to establish a committee 
of three union workers, four students, 10 faculty and two 
senior administrators to re-examine university wage 
policies.

A statement from the Living Wage Campaign, issued as the 
protesters left the building, noted that: "Before the sit-in 
began, the university had fully rejected living wages and 
had stated that it regarded the issue of poverty wages on 
campus as closed."

Harvard also agreed that until the committee reaches its 
conclusions, the university will stop outsourcing custodial 
and dining work to outside subcontractors.

The university heads also agreed to early renegotiations of 
the contract covering some 650 unionized custodial workers. 
A resulting agreement could mean a wage increase for these 
very poorly paid workers retroactive to May 1.

And according to the May 9 New York Times, Harvard agreed to 
reexamine its health insurance co-payment for hundreds of 
its lowest-paid workers.

SOLIDARITY FOREVER!

Who made up the student protesters inside the building?

On Day 17, occupier Jane Martin leaned out a Mass Hall 
window to tell Workers World, "It's a cool group of people. 
The gender dynamic is really good. People come from 
different backgrounds, different class backgrounds, ethnic 
backgrounds, a lot of sexual diversity."

Al Cho, co-chair of the Bisexual, Gay, Lesbian, Transgender 
and Supporters Alliance, said the occupiers included "A good 
mix of Asians and South Asians and a lot of them queer."

About half the Harvard occupiers were Jewish students. And 
Latino and Black students took part in the overall protest.

At the May 8 rally to welcome the student protesters, 
supporters pumped the air with clenched fists as Ed Childs--
chief shop steward of Local 26 HERE--told them, "We are a 
family here. We have redefined family--Black, Latino, Asian, 
white, students, workers, faculty, immigrants, women and 
men, gay, straight and trans. There are 87 languages in my 
union.

"You have awakened a sleeping giant. And it goes beyond this 
campus." Referring to the growing mobilization to protest in 
Washington, D.C., on Sept. 29, Childs concluded, "Let's tell 
Bush in the White House that we are coming for you."

Speakers were cheered when they expressed solidarity with 
Black Northeastern students who are involved in their own 
occupation because administrators threatened to take away 
their campus building.

Several days before the Harvard occupation ended, Workers 
World asked Aaron Bentley about the power of the living wage 
campaign as he leaned out the window of Mass Hall.

He said, "I think this really is an emerging movement with a 
real capability to transform public consciousness about 
economic justice and racial justice and some real bonds 
between students and workers and labor unions in general in 
a way that will be a force to be reckoned with."

The widespread solidarity movement ignited by the bodacious 
takeover bears out the truth of what Bentley stated.

Ashwini Sukthankar, a second-year law student, was inside 
the occupation for the first week. She told Workers World 
that when the students first burst into the administration 
building for the takeover they brought just a little food 
with them, assuming police would quickly eject them.

But when the occupation continued, she was impressed with 
how quickly the faculty organized themselves to support it. 
"Three hundred faculty members signed letters supporting the 
sit-in within 48 hours."

One sign of the wide net this struggle cast could be gauged 
by a poster hanging on the building next to Mass Hall: 
"String theorists for a living wage!"

Support signs were plastered on all the nearby buildings and 
hanging from trees in Harvard Yard. The groups in support of 
the living wage campaign for Harvard's 1,000 or so poorest-
paid workers included some of the following:

Muslims, Spanish-speaking students, Black Student 
Association, Fuerza Latina, Society of Arab students, 
Bisexual, Gay, Lesbian, Transgender and Supporters Alliance, 
African students, Lesbian Avengers, Korean students, Tufts 
Queer Women, International students, medical students, Queer 
Queens, Harvard artists, Graduate music students, Harvard 
Square homeless shelter, Walton high school students, 
Brandeis Leftist League, Activist Resource Center and 
Weathervane magazine.

The student takeover won enthusiastic support from campus 
janitors, clerical and technical workers, parents, faculty 
members, alumni/ae and all the campus unions.

During the sit-in, protesters told Workers World how 
thrilled they were on the first night when hundreds of 
militant dining hall workers chanting in thunderous support 
of the students delivered pizzas for their first real meal.

Ed Childs told Workers World that when the food workers made 
their first delivery, they told police stationed outside 
Mass Hall, "Our job is to feed the students and that's what 
we're here to do. This food is going through the door or 
through the windows--which will it be?"

>From that day forward, deliveries of all meals for student 
protesters got inside without delay.

Support from outside the campus included community leaders, 
anti-globalization activists, religious groups, local and 
national politicians, the Rev. Jesse Jackson, NAACP, Julian 
Bond, the rock group Rage Against the Machine, actors and 
writers.

Many area unionists joined the campaign. The Massachusetts 
AFL-CIO passed a resolution supporting the students, donated 
money and sent representatives to the rallies.

On April 30 a labor rally of over 2,000 in front of 
Massachusetts Hall featured AFL-CIO President John Sweeney, 
Secretary-Treasurer Richard Trumka and Executive Vice 
President Linda Chavez-Thompson.

On May 7, AFL-CIO Secretary-Treasurer Richard Trumka was 
accorded the honor of opening the door of Massachusetts 
Hall. As student protesters emerged into the sunlight for 
the first time in 482 hours, Trumka saluted their efforts.

"The students were willing to take a stand and took on a 
powerful university whose endowment is bigger than the Gross 
National Product of most of the countries of the world," 
said Trumka. "The workers who cut the grass, clean the 
offices and cook the food now have a chance to move out of 
poverty."

The official statement issued by the Harvard Living Wage 
Campaign stated, "In the last 21 days, the Harvard Living 
Wage Campaign has won tremendous victories, building a 
community-wide affirmation of the living wage principle.

"The university-wide committee process with worker and 
student participation, the commitments about collective 
bargaining with SEIU Local 254 and HERE Local 26, the 
possibility of back pay for Harvard's custodians and the 
moratorium on outsourcing promise substantive gains for 
workers at Harvard.

"The students, faculty, alumni, clergy, area citizens and 
workers of all backgrounds who make up our campaign are 
united in overwhelming support for a living wage for all 
workers at Harvard, and for each other as vital members of 
our community."

The statement concluded, "Today we are taking important 
first steps towards a time when no worker at Harvard needs 
to work 80 hours a week, when no worker at Harvard cannot 
spend time with his or her kids, and when no worker at 
Harvard needs to worry about basic health care or paying the 
rent."

As student protesters left their occupation, vowing to 
continue their struggle, supporters handed each a rose. But 
these students are fighting to win bread, as well as roses, 
for the most exploited and downtrodden.

Includes reports from Rachel Nasca.

- END -

(Copyright Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to 
copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but 
changing it is not allowed. For more information contact 
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] For subscription info send message to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.workers.org)





------------------
This message is sent to you by Workers World News Service.
To subscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Send administrative queries to  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to