-------------------------
Via Workers World News Service
Reprinted from the June 21, 2001
issue of Workers World newspaper
-------------------------

STANDARIZED TESTING: WHAT'S AT STAKE IN HIGH STAKES

By Lyn Neeley
Teacher at East Side Community H.S., New York City

High-Stakes Tests produce a single numerical score to 
determine if a student passes to the next grade.

Take this test:

High-Stakes Tests are valuable to public education because 
they:

[ ] a. prepare students for high-paying jobs

[ ] b. help students pass high school

[ ] c. raise the teaching standards in public schools

[ ] d. develop "higher level" thinking   skills

[ ] e. are an accurate way of measuring intelligence

If you're having trouble choosing a correct answer, you're 
not alone. The testing craze sweeping the country is full of 
empty promises that right-wing educators, politicians and 
testing corporations use to confuse the public.

Standardized tests are being used to dismantle free public 
education, institutionalize racism and widen the gap between 
social classes.

"My guess is that testing improves education the same way 
that bombing promotes democracy," said Steve Cohn, an 
education professor at Tufts.

Standardized tests are turning schools into corporations 
where the bottom line is how well students do on the tests. 
Instead of raising standards, High-Stakes Tests dull down 
the curriculum--and the students' minds.

Creativity, reasoning and analyzing skills are sacrificed 
when students are
forced to memorize and regurgitate isolated facts and 
choose only one right answer.

In order to pass the state-mandated tests, many schools are 
eliminating art, music and physical education to make time 
for test preparation classes that are more cost effective. 
Teachers who have to "teach to the test" become automatons, 
spending larger chunks of curriculum time giving tests and 
getting students ready for tests.

In Montgomery County, Md., students spend 50 hours each year 
just taking tests. And that doesn't include Advanced 
Placement tests.

Caleb Rossiter, who teaches statistics at American 
University, wrote, "If you could see how they waste 
students' time with all this test prep--it's so 
disheartening."

Educator Peter Sacks explained, "Evidence strongly suggests 
that standardized testing flies in the face of recent 
advances in our understanding of how people learn to think 
and reason."

One study showed that 77 percent of teachers feel that 
standardized tests are not worth the time and money spent on 
them. Many educators and reformers have developed 
alternative methods of authentic assessment.

This kind of assessment, Sacks explained, is "the notion 
that students ought to be judged on the basis of what they 
can actually do, not how well they take tests. Also called 
performance assessment, these methods can mean anything from 
evaluating portfolios of student work or writing samples to 
art and science projects."

Teachers are better than standardized tests at assessing the 
progress of students.

BUSH'S HIDDEN AGENDA

What's the real agenda behind the George Bush education 
agenda, which he dubs "No Child Left Behind"? Without 
mentioning any dollar figures, the plan calls for vouchers 
to promote private schools, and for standardized math and 
reading tests in grades three to eight.

It also promises to "reward success" and "sanction failure" 
by introducing a program of merit pay for teachers and 
schools, based on test scores. Thus the tests will be used 
to grade teachers and principals, which the tests supposedly 
were not designed to do.

High-Stakes Testing is cost effective. It serves as a smoke 
screen for policy makers, politicians and the media--and the 
business interests they all represent--to look as if they 
are raising the standards and improving schools. It covers 
up their failure to provide money for programs that would 
make real improvements.

In fact, poor scores are being used as the rationale for 
leaving many children behind by cutting resources and 
privatizing schools, especially in poor, under-funded urban 
school districts.

Teachers in New York City earn 25 percent less than those in 
the suburbs. Not a big draw to attract highly qualified 
teachers.

New York City's school districts received $8,213 per capita 
for each student compared to the surrounding suburban 
districts, which get $12,050 per student.

Money is needed for programs that are proven to help all 
children succeed. A good teacher and a well-run school mean 
far more to a child than another test. If public education 
is to be improved, class size must be reduced, financial 
incentives provided for the most qualified and experienced 
teachers. There must be teacher-training programs. The 
number of teachers of color must be increased.

The schools need up-to-date materials, much-improved 
resources, more schools and better maintenance of school 
buildings.

TESTING FLUNKS

The New York Times recently reported, "The testing industry 
is coming off its three most problem-plagued years that have 
affected millions of students who took standardized 
proficiency tests."

Writing and scoring tests is a new quarter-billion-dollar 
industry. It is dominated by four companies: CTB/McGraw-
Hill, Harcourt, Riverside and NCS Pearson.

To maintain profits these companies pay only $9 an hour to 
employees who work 12 hours a day, six days a week. 
Employees told the Times that they were "pressed to score 
student essays without adequate training and that they saw 
tests scored in an arbitrary and inconsistent manner. Lots 
of people don't even read the whole test--the time pressure 
and scoring pressure are just too great."

In Minnesota last May, 47,000 students received lower scores 
than they deserved. Mistakes in the scores of standardized 
tests were questioned in Michigan, California, Arizona, 
Washington, Tennessee, Indiana and Nevada as well.

After lies and attempts to cover up its mistakes, CTB/McGraw-
Hill finally admitted to errors in scoring standardized 
tests.

When Rudy Crew was hired as New York's school chancellor, it 
was largely because he had engineered a big increase in 
standardized test scores in Tacoma, Wash., in the early 
1990s.

In 1999, Crew and the New York Board of Education decided to 
raise the stakes for CTB test scores. Students who failed 
the tests would be required to pass summer school or be held 
back a grade. School principals and superintendents could 
lose their jobs if students scored poorly.

When devastating results came back, it looked as if reading 
scores had stagnated for two years. New York Mayor Rudolph 
Giuliani fired Crew soon afterward.

Now it has been proven that 9,000 of the New York 
schoolchildren who were forced to attend summer school in 
1999 shouldn't have been there. They had been mistakenly 
scored too low by CTB.

BUILT-IN RACIST BIAS

African American and Latino students are disproportionately 
failing standardized tests.

"It's revealing that standardized tests have their origins 
in the Eugenics movement earlier in this century and its 
belief in the intellectual superiority of northern European 
whites," Barbara Minor writes in "Rethinking Schools."

The "standardized tests didn't really exist until it was 
decided that IQ and similar tests were a valid way to 
identify 'superior' and 'inferior' students," she continued. 
"Standardized tests legitimize and preserve existing power 
relations."

Recent studies show that people taking the SAT college 
admission test will score an extra 30 points for every 
$10,000 in their parents' yearly income.

A study of California high-school students revealed that 
parent education alone explained more than 50 percent of the 
variation in SAT scores.

A principal at a school on New York 's Lower East Side said: 
"Let's be honest. If poor, inner-city children consistently 
out scored children from wealthy suburban homes on 
standardized tests, is anyone naive enough to believe that 
we would still insist on using these tests as indicators of 
success?"

Standardized tests will prevent thousands of students from 
graduating from high school, especially in under-funded 
urban schools with predominantly students of color.

These young people will become members of the growing pool 
of non-skilled, underpaid workers that capitalism needs to 
maximize profits. Or they will become part of the profitable 
prison-industrial population and receive no salary--creating 
more wealth for the ruling class.

Emphasizing standardized testing does not train students to 
be critical thinkers. A hidden agenda of the testing craze 
is the movement to eliminate anti-racist, multicultural 
education that arms young people with an understanding of 
themselves, their cultures and the contradictions of being 
poor in the leading industrialized country.

A hundred years ago capitalism needed to take rural 
agricultural workers and turn them into a disciplined work 
force to run its factories. That's when the promise of 
universal, free education became a mandate.

Forty years ago, when businesses needed workers for an 
expanding service economy, it produced a boom in community 
and junior colleges.

But in today's high-tech society fewer educated, skilled 
workers are needed. The main purpose of standardized testing 
is to sort students according to criteria set by the bosses.

Take this test: What's at stake if the schools continue to 
use high-stakes standardized testing?

Answer: A free, well-rounded education for all students.

- END -

(Copyright Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to 
copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but 
changing it is not allowed. For more information contact 
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] For subscription info send message to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.workers.org)





------------------
This message is sent to you by Workers World News Service.
To subscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Send administrative queries to  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to