www-archive

Messages by Date

2011/04/19 Re: clarifications to issue 31 title as conforming when alt is omitted Steve Faulkner
2011/04/19 Re: clarifications to issue 31 title as conforming when alt is omitted Jonas Sicking
2011/04/16 youtube i18n Danny Ayers
2011/04/15 Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-155 table-border Leif Halvard Silli
2011/04/15 Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-155 table-border Tab Atkins Jr.
2011/04/15 Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-155 table-border Leif Halvard Silli
2011/04/15 Re: CSS, certain "presentational" attributes and HTML5 Aryeh Gregor
2011/04/15 Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence Danny Ayers
2011/04/14 Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence Ian Hickson
2011/04/14 Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence Danny Ayers
2011/04/14 Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence Ian Hickson
2011/04/14 Re: Is this a situation that the W3C condones and is willing to accept? Jeff Jaffe
2011/04/14 Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence Steve Faulkner
2011/04/13 Re: Comments on SVG Compositing Ian Hickson
2011/04/13 Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence Ian Hickson
2011/04/13 Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence Ian Hickson
2011/04/13 Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence Nathan
2011/04/13 Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence Sam Ruby
2011/04/13 Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence Ian Hickson
2011/04/13 Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence Sam Ruby
2011/04/13 Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence Ian Hickson
2011/04/12 Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes Danny Ayers
2011/04/12 Fwd: Re: RDFa and the OpenGraph Protocol James Graham
2011/04/12 Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes Henri Sivonen
2011/04/12 RE: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata Henri Sivonen
2011/04/11 Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes Danny Ayers
2011/04/10 Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes Henri Sivonen
2011/04/09 CSS, certain "presentational" attributes and HTML5 Leif Halvard Silli
2011/04/08 Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes Julian Reschke
2011/04/06 Re: Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Leif Halvard Silli
2011/04/06 Re: Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Leif Halvard Silli
2011/04/06 Re: Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Leif Halvard Silli
2011/04/06 Re: Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Karl Dubost
2011/04/06 Re: Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Leif Halvard Silli
2011/04/06 Re: Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Karl Dubost
2011/04/05 Re: Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Leif Halvard Silli
2011/04/05 Re: Suggestions for HTML-WG decision summary Sam Ruby
2011/04/05 Suggestions for HTML-WG decision summary Karl Dubost
2011/04/04 Re: Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Leif Halvard Silli
2011/04/04 Re: Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Leif Halvard Silli
2011/04/04 Objections to no-change proposal, ISSUE-155 Leif Halvard Silli
2011/04/04 Re: Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Aryeh Gregor
2011/04/04 ISSUE-27 poll feedback^2 Julian Reschke
2011/04/04 Re: Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Laura Carlson
2011/04/03 Re: Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Ian Hickson
2011/04/03 [wbs] response to 'ISSUE-144: Make "u" element conforming - Straw Poll for Objections' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2011/04/03 [wbs] response to 'ISSUE-144: Make "u" element conforming - Straw Poll for Objections' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2011/04/03 [wbs] response to 'ISSUE-144: Make "u" element conforming - Straw Poll for Objections' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2011/04/03 [wbs] response to 'ISSUE-144: Make "u" element conforming - Straw Poll for Objections' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2011/04/03 [wbs] response to 'ISSUE-144: Make "u" element conforming - Straw Poll for Objections' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2011/04/03 Re: Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Leif Halvard Silli
2011/04/03 Re: Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Aryeh Gregor
2011/04/02 RE: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Paul Cotton
2011/04/02 Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Nathan
2011/04/02 Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Cameron Heavon-Jones
2011/04/02 Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Cameron Heavon-Jones
2011/04/02 Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Nathan
2011/04/02 Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Cameron Heavon-Jones
2011/04/02 Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Cameron Heavon-Jones
2011/04/02 contenteditable and PUT - was Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Nathan
2011/04/02 Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Nathan
2011/04/02 Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Julian Reschke
2011/04/02 Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Cameron Heavon-Jones
2011/04/02 Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Cameron Heavon-Jones
2011/04/02 Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Cameron Heavon-Jones
2011/04/02 Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] mike amundsen
2011/04/02 Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] mike amundsen
2011/04/02 Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Danny Ayers
2011/04/02 Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Julian Reschke
2011/04/01 Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Arthur Clifford
2011/04/01 Re: Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Leif Halvard Silli
2011/04/01 [wbs] response to 'ISSUE-155: Make border attribute conforming on table element - Straw Poll for Objections' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2011/04/01 [wbs] response to 'ISSUE-155: Make border attribute conforming on table element - Straw Poll for Objections' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2011/04/01 Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] mike amundsen
2011/04/01 [wbs] response to 'ISSUE-27: @rel value ownership, registry consideration - Straw Poll for Objections' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2011/04/01 Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Subbu Allamaraju
2011/04/01 Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] mike amundsen
2011/04/01 Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Aryeh Gregor
2011/04/01 Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Sam Ruby
2011/04/01 Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Julian Reschke
2011/04/01 Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Sam Ruby
2011/04/01 [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Nathan
2011/04/01 Re: Working Group Decision on 142 poster-alt Aryeh Gregor
2011/04/01 Re: Working Group Decision on 142 poster-alt Sam Ruby
2011/03/31 Re: Feedback on ISSUE-27 poll feedback, Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Straw Poll for Objections Sam Ruby
2011/03/31 [wbs] response to 'ISSUE-131: Should we add a caret location API to canvas? - Straw Poll for Objections' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2011/03/31 [wbs] response to 'ISSUE-131: Should we add a caret location API to canvas? - Straw Poll for Objections' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2011/03/30 sample HTML encoded in UTF-7 Julian Reschke
2011/03/24 Test case for CSS21 Issue 203 Anton Prowse
2011/03/24 [wbs] response to 'ISSUE-122: alt text and description for Lady of Shalott example - Straw Poll for Objections' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2011/03/24 Nodes and Arcs Sean B. Palmer
2011/03/23 [wbs] response to 'ISSUE-27: @rel value ownership, registry consideration - Straw Poll for Objections' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2011/03/22 Re: feedback on ISSUE-27 survey feedback, Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Straw Poll for Objections Julian Reschke
2011/03/22 Re: feedback on ISSUE-27 survey feedback, Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Straw Poll for Objections Jonas Sicking
2011/03/22 feedback on ISSUE-27 survey feedback, Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Straw Poll for Objections Julian Reschke
2011/03/17 [wbs] response to 'ISSUE-120: Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology - Straw Poll for Objections' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2011/03/17 Crash bug in pngout Bjoern Hoehrmann
2011/03/17 [wbs] response to 'ISSUE-120: Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology - Straw Poll for Objections' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2011/03/16 Re: Fwd: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-130: table-layout Sam Ruby
2011/03/16 Fwd: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-130: table-layout Sean B. Palmer
2011/03/15 Notes on `pngwolf` and PNG optimization (draft) Bjoern Hoehrmann
2011/03/15 Re: HTML5 citing RFC 1345 as normative reference for US-ASCII John C Klensin
2011/03/15 Re: HTML5 citing RFC 1345 as normative reference for US-ASCII Mark Nottingham
2011/03/15 Re: HTML5 citing RFC 1345 as normative reference for US-ASCII Sam Ruby
2011/03/14 zlib 1.2.5 puff.c fixed() fails to initialize tables Bjoern Hoehrmann
2011/03/12 minor editorial correction in text/n3 review request type: text/n3 Eric Prud'hommeaux
2011/03/12 minor editorial correction in text/turtle review request Eric Prud'hommeaux
2011/03/12 Spellchecker for the DOM Sean B. Palmer
2011/03/11 Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-130: table-layout Sam Ruby
2011/03/11 Request for review of Notation3 (an RDF serialization) media type: text/n3 Eric Prud'hommeaux
2011/03/11 Request for review of Turtle (an RDF serialization) media type: text/turtle Eric Prud'hommeaux
2011/03/09 Re: Option 3 Ian Hickson
2011/03/07 Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-129 aria-mapping Sam Ruby
2011/03/06 Patch: archiverProxy mangles "newlines" on Win32 Bjoern Hoehrmann
2011/03/05 CSS properties supported in Opera 11.01 Geoffrey Sneddon
2011/03/03 Comments on REC-PNG-20031110 Bjoern Hoehrmann
2011/03/02 Re: Fwd: Chair’s decision to reopen ISSUE-30 Leif Halvard Silli
2011/03/02 Fwd: Chair’s decision to reopen ISSUE-30 Sam Ruby
2011/03/02 Re: modify CSS on HTML5 Edition for Web Authors Steve Faulkner
2011/03/01 WebP versus RIFF Bjoern Hoehrmann
2011/02/28 Tokyo/SF mini conf call agenda 3/2 Koji Ishii
2011/02/27 jsinq bug: .min/.max on single-element list Bjoern Hoehrmann
2011/02/27 [wbs] response to 'ISSUE-124: Allow noreferrer and nofollow on <link> - Straw Poll for Objections' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2011/02/25 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML Danny Ayers
2011/02/25 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML Steve Faulkner
2011/02/25 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML Karl Dubost
2011/02/25 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML Ian Hickson
2011/02/24 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML Danny Ayers
2011/02/24 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML Ian Hickson
2011/02/24 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML Ian Hickson
2011/02/24 Re: new information & the re-opening of issues in the HTML WG Edward O'Connor
2011/02/24 RE: new information & the re-opening of issues in the HTML WG Paul Cotton
2011/02/24 Re: new information & the re-opening of issues in the HTML WG Edward O'Connor
2011/02/24 RE: ISSUE-161 accessibility-api-mapping - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals Paul Cotton
2011/02/24 RE: new information & the re-opening of issues in the HTML WG Paul Cotton
2011/02/24 new information & the re-opening of issues in the HTML WG Edward O'Connor
2011/02/24 Re: Link probelm when trying to run my own SaxonSavvyServlet Ted Guild
2011/02/24 Re: ISSUE-161 accessibility-api-mapping - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals Steve Faulkner
2011/02/24 HTML 5 Issue 130 Objection to Richard Schwerdtfeger
2011/02/23 Client HTTP headers survey Karl Dubost
2011/02/23 modify CSS on HTML5 Edition for Web Authors Steve Faulkner
2011/02/22 Re: feedback on HTML5 A technical specification for Web developers Steve Faulkner
2011/02/22 Re: feedback on HTML5 A technical specification for Web developers Ben Schwarz
2011/02/22 Re: feedback on HTML5 A technical specification for Web developers Steve Faulkner
2011/02/22 Re: feedback on HTML5 A technical specification for Web developers Ben Schwarz
2011/02/22 Fwd: feedback on HTML5 A technical specification for Web developers Steve Faulkner
2011/02/22 feedback on HTML5 A technical specification for Web developers Steve Faulkner
2011/02/20 Re: request to review HTML WG chairs decision on issue 133 Laura Carlson
2011/02/19 Re: request to review HTML WG chairs decision on issue 133 Sam Ruby
2011/02/18 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML Danny Ayers
2011/02/18 Comments on draft-accilent-at-sign-00.txt Bjoern Hoehrmann
2011/02/17 Re: Tokyo/SF mini conf call minutes 2/15 fantasai
2011/02/16 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML Nathan
2011/02/16 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML Ian Jacobs
2011/02/16 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML Jeff Jaffe
2011/02/16 login not working Jeremy Carroll
2011/02/15 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML Nathan
2011/02/15 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML Karl Dubost
2011/02/15 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML Ian Hickson
2011/02/15 examples where fixed spec targets are useful (was Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML) Danny Ayers
2011/02/15 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML Ian Jacobs
2011/02/15 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML Nathan
2011/02/15 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML Julian Reschke
2011/02/15 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML Ian Hickson
2011/02/15 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML Karl Dubost
2011/02/15 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML Karl Dubost
2011/02/15 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML Nathan
2011/02/15 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML Sam Ruby
2011/02/15 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML Karl Dubost
2011/02/15 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML Nathan
2011/02/15 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML jeff
2011/02/15 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing developmentof HTML Steve Faulkner
2011/02/15 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML Nathan
2011/02/15 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML Julian Reschke
2011/02/15 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML Ian Hickson
2011/02/15 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing developmentof HTML jeff
2011/02/15 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML Danny Ayers
2011/02/15 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML Steve Faulkner
2011/02/14 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML Ian Jacobs
2011/02/14 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML Steve Faulkner
2011/02/14 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML Ian Jacobs
2011/02/14 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML Steve Faulkner
2011/02/10 [wbs] response to 'ISSUE-129: replace or modify the ARIA section of the HTML5 spec - Straw Poll for Objections' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2011/02/09 Objections to ISSUE-129 CP1 Ian Hickson
2011/02/09 Re: Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML Ian Jacobs
2011/02/08 Please explain the role of the W3C in the continuing development of HTML Steve Faulkner
2011/02/05 Re: variables/mixins in chrome Bjoern Hoehrmann
2011/02/03 Re: single and multipage out of synch Michael[tm] Smith
2011/02/03 single and multipage out of synch Steve Faulkner
2011/02/02 Re: request to review HTML WG chairs decision on issue 133 Laura Carlson
2011/02/02 Re: request to review HTML WG chairs decision on issue 133 Michael[tm] Smith
2011/02/02 Re: request to review HTML WG chairs decision on issue 133 Steve Faulkner
2011/02/01 Re: request to review HTML WG chairs decision on issue 133 Michael[tm] Smith
2011/02/01 request to review HTML WG chairs decision on issue 133 Steve Faulkner
2011/02/01 Re: Call for a poll of the html wg on removal of hgroup was Re: review of hgroup element prior to last call. Edward O'Connor
2011/01/31 [wbs] response to 'Grant II: Grant of License for Contributed Test Cases Published Outside a W3C Recommendation' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2011/01/28 Test Archived-At header for Roundcube webmail rendering Vivien Lacourba
2011/01/27 RELAX NG to JSON compiler, or whatever Bjoern Hoehrmann
2011/01/26 Re: HTML WG timeframe for responses Steve Faulkner
2011/01/25 Re: HTML WG timeframe for responses Ian Hickson