-- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
disposition-of-comments2html.py
Description: Binary data
XBL 2.0 Disposition of Comments
Comment 1
Summary: Request for more examples.
Status: Agreed.
- http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.tech.xbl/msg/e76290449f82236c
- http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.tech.xbl/msg/c61422da2c1bbb6c
- http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.tech.xbl/msg/c033ce4bce673cc2
- http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.tech.xbl/msg/b94fd39f58906826
- http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.tech.xbl/msg/cf103b3ca6bdc93a
- http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.tech.xbl/msg/c329c40bde033e0c
Comment 2
Summary: Typos in examples.
Status: Agreed.
- http://www.w3.org/mid/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0026.html
Comment 3
Summary: Issues with namespace prefixes in selectors
Status: Disagreed with proposal of introducing new prefix declaration
Comment 4
Summary: Query regarding requirements for authoring tools
Status: Resolved as part of comment 11.
- http://www.w3.org/mid/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0029.html
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0045.html
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0048.html
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0056.html
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0065.html
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0074.html
Comment 5
Summary: Use "fragment body" instead of "subtree" when definining "XBL subtree".
Status: Rejected on technical grounds.
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0005.html
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0030.html
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0049.html
Comment 6
Summary: Suggestions for a better abstract.
Status: Made some changes, though not all those suggested.
- http://www.w3.org/mid/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0031.html
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0050.html
Comment 7
Summary: Suggestions for a better introduction.
Status: Rejected; the suggestions did not seem like improvements.
- http://www.w3.org/mid/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0032.html
- http://www.w3.org/mid/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Comment 8
Summary: Comments regarding extensibility.
Status: Made some changes, though not all those suggested.
- http://www.w3.org/mid/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0033.html
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0109.html (WG)
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0112.html
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0118.html
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0119.html
Comment 9
Summary: Comment regarding xml:id and request to get review from XMLCWG
Comment 10
Summary: Confusion about the definition of "shadow tree".
Status: Unclear how to proceed. Rejected pending further comment.
- http://www.w3.org/mid/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0035.html
Comment 11
Summary: Request to define conformance classes.
Status: Accepted.
- http://www.w3.org/mid/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0036.html
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0111.html (WG)
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0120.html
Comment 12
Summary: Request to define "expected context" and to use a schema language.
Status: Fixed text to avoid needing to define the term. Couldn't find
Comment 13
Summary: Request to change some element names.
Status: Rejected since current names were the result of a lot of time
Comment 14
Summary: Request to allow any implementation mechanism for parsing.
Status: Reviewer said the issue was on hold. Unclear how to proceed.
- http://www.w3.org/mid/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0039.html
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0077.html
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0113.html (WG)
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0122.html
Comment 15
Summary: Request to split a paragraph in two.
Status: Agreed. Fixed that paragraph and a number of other ones.
- http://www.w3.org/mid/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0040.html
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0053.html
Comment 16
Summary: Query about the "unless it has already been loaded" text.
Status: Query was based on misunderstanding. Clarified spec a little.
- http://www.w3.org/mid/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0041.html
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0114.html (WG)
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0121.html
Comment 17
Summary: Comment regarding XML Events and request to work with HTMLWG
Status: Unclear how to proceed. Rejected pending further comment.
- http://www.w3.org/mid/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0042.html
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0080.html
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0091.html
Comment 18
Summary: Suggestion not to use @namespace url() syntax.
Status: Rejected. Reviewer said the issue was on hold. Unclear how to
Comment 19
Summary: Question about the term "semantic-free XML element".
Status: Unclear how to proceed. Rejected pending further comment.
- http://www.w3.org/mid/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0046.html
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0057.html
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0066.html
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0073.html
Comment 20
Summary: Request to clarify "do not support CSS".
Status: Rejected.
- http://www.w3.org/mid/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0051.html
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0055.html
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0064.html
Comment 21
Summary: Editorial fix in xblSetInsertionPoint definition.
Status: Fixed.
- http://www.w3.org/mid/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0054.html
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0060.html
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0068.html
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0071.html
Comment 22
Summary: are interfaces always implemented?
Status: Fixed.
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0070.html
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0088.html
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0115.html (WG)
Comment 23
Summary: Abstract changes.
Status: Fixed.
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0084.html
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/0094.html
Comment 24
Summary: Confusion over the word "ignore"
Status: Fixed.
