On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 00:28:28 +0200, Karl Dubost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le 20 juin 2007 à 04:17, Anne van Kesteren a écrit :
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 19:35:56 +0200, Geoffrey Sneddon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I too think that this should remain conforming. I do, however, think
that the tutorial should teach all elements to be closed, ...
I don't think there should be such a thing as "_the_ tutorial", to be
honest. Tutorials, like all other implementations of the specification,
are something to compete on I think.
Is it your personal opinion or Opera's one?
I don't think Opera has an opinion on tutorials.
Could you explain the rationale for this position? (having an official
tutorial, do not forbid people to write books in any case.)
The rationale is that the official tutorial will always be deferred to as
the "correct" one. Where in fact any tutorial that stays within the limits
of the specification is correct. This issue has arisen with conformance
checkers before.
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
