On Jul 2, 2007, at 3:42 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 22:05:11 +0200, Robert Burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I can't think of any reason not to continue accommodating the use-
cases accommodated by HTML4
Since you mentioned them a few times, do you perhaps have a pointer
to those use cases?
I forget what the context is on this. Is this about the @summary and
@longdesc? The sue cases are authors who want to provide possibly
lengthy and possibly semantically rich description of inherently
visual content to those who have a visual impairment. In the case of
@summary, that doesn't necessarily meet the semantically rich
description criteria, but it can be potentially lengthy and
descriptive. In particular this is a use-case for description that is
redundant for sighted users and would even be annoying for them to
have to read (if it was displayed by default).
I hope that addresses your question.
Take care,
Rob
