On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:34:43 +0200, Robert Burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So far I haven't seen much activity in the getting user agents more
interopable area. Most of it is people requesting a <burger/> element
to be included in the next version of HTML. And complaints about some
explicit accessibility features from HTML 4 that are not included in
the current draft because several use cases were not considered and not
much research was done in the area.
I can't imagine how our WG can't be about interoperability.
Me neither.
As for <burger/> element, the closest thing we have to a <burger/>
element are the <video>, <audio>, and <canvas> elements.
These are not requested, these are being implemented. The specification is
there to make sure they are implemented in an interoperable way. They help
making HTML a more viable open alternative to Flash, Flex, Silverlight,
etc.
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
