On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 10:52 -0700, Chris Wilson wrote: > The tone of conversations on the HTML WG and around the area in general is > getting, frankly, > rude (ruder?). I don't think that's productive. I understand your point, > and personally > I completely agree with it. The way you raised the issue was directed at > Anne, personally > - I think that is a mistake, and raises the level of rudeness rather than > lowers it. > This is a problem with a number of people - your example with Anne was > actually not a > particularly egregious example. I would have asked you to send a mail to the > entire WG > instead that said "I've noticed a number of WG members representing HTML5 as > having made > decisions already. I would like to ask that we all not do that. Here are > some examples > from various people:... Can we all agree that we must be explicit in saying > 'current > thinking/draft' rather than making it sound like decisions have already been > made?" > or something like that.
Ah... yes, well said; that seems much more likely to move us forward. > Does that accomplish attacking the problem as you see it? -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
