> has enough process been completed on the W3C side for me
> to effectively say to Dick that W3C has approved this erratum
> through its processes and hence we now invite ISO/IEC to do
> likewise?
I've looked back through some old files. This error must have creapt in
very early on. Certainly the PNG 1.1 and 1.2 drafts I have use the RGB
order.
I believe the PNG-1.2 draft establishes our position, so I don't
think a formal vote is necessary. Our voting process takes a
minimum of 28 days. I recall that in the past we have used
a Call for Unanimous Consent or Call for Objection, which took
14 days. But in this instance I don't think even that is required.
Glenn
