Robert Sayre wrote:
But, frankly, I haven't given much thought to the process details going forward. I'm pretty sure we can do better than a process one might term "Autocratic Decisions Made Based On Secret Feedback, Followed By Condescending Denials Of Autocratic Decision Making, Characterization Of Dissent As 'Force', And Cynical Patent FUD".
My recommendation: spend more time writing spec text, and less time characterizing the contributions of others. Seriously.
80% of the current document is not only good, it is very, very good. An even with your "no inventions" approach, upwards of 60% of this material is ready to be standardized now.
And, if someone has a better way, they can write a document too.
+1
- Rob
- Sam Ruby
