L. David Baron wrote: > On Monday 2009-06-08 11:30 -0700, fantasai wrote: >> Looks good, however, ince "acknowledgement" /is/ an acceptable US spelling* >> (even if the spellchecker prefers "acknowledgment") I would prefer to keep >> that. Mostly because I think "acknowledgment" is an inane variant that >> violates both phonetic and morphemic orthography, but also because then >> it still matches the anchor. :) > > Except for that one, I was only changing the spelling in the Changes > section to match the actual spec (which uses the spelling that my > spellchecker prefers, except for the name of the named anchor, which > I left). > > Bert, is it ok to commit these? (Current patch attached.)
Looks good. Some of the files have changed today, be sure to do a cvs update before the commit. Bert -- Bert Bos ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/ http://www.w3.org/people/bos W3C/ERCIM [email protected] 2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93 +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
