> Is there a specific reason this item is not going to a survey? Maciej and I discussed the open issues while preparing the agenda and we did not discuss this issue.
> Is your agenda item implying that you're issuing a second call for revision? Yes. /paulc Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329 -----Original Message----- From: Shelley Powers [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 8:16 AM To: Paul Cotton; Sam Ruby; Maciej Stachowiak Cc: www-archive Subject: HTML WG telecon 2010-07-08 specific items I read through the agenda items for the HTML WG's next teleconference [1] and had a couple of questions: I notice that Issue 89 is not on the agenda. Is there some reason for a delay on this item? In addition, I noticed the following: > 4. Issues needing revised proposals > Note: The Chairs will be requesting revised proposals for the > following issues. > > a) Issue-31 missing-alt > b) Issue-56 urls-webarch > c) Issue-80 title-alternative > d) Issue-85 anchor-roles > e) Issue-100 srcdoc I believe that you all issued a request for a revised proposals for several of these issues, including Issue 100. And that a deadline of June 30th was given for these updates. Is your agenda item implying that you're issuing a second call for revision? Or that the time has come, and gone, in order to make these revisions, and unrevised proposals are being dropped? Thank you Shelley Powers
