Paul Cotton, Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:30:50 +0000: >> The Decision namely states that there are two ways to appeal it, and >> I believed that it was very clear from my letter >> which option I chose. --- > I believe Leif is appealing the Chairs' decision as per: > > http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#WGAppeals > > 3.5 Appeal of a Chair's Decision .... > When group participants believe that their concerns are not being > duly considered by the group, they MAY ask the > Director<http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/organization.html#def-Director> > (for representatives of a Member organization, via their Advisory > Committee representative) to confirm or deny the decision. The > participants SHOULD also make their requests known to the Team > Contact<http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/groups.html#TeamContact>. > The Team Contact MUST inform the Director when a group participant > has raised concerns about due process. > > Any requests to the Director to confirm a decision MUST include a > summary of the issue (whether technical or procedural), decision, and > rationale for the objection. All counter-arguments, rationales, and > decisions MUST be recorded. > > Since Leif is an Invited Expert in the HTML WG he is entitled to send > this appeal to the Director via the Team Contact. > > /paulc
Hi. Thanks! Yes, I suppose that this must be what the Decision document meant. So, if I understand, once the Team Contact has contated the Director, I can except the Director to confirm or deny the Decision based on the concerns I have raised. -- leif halvard silli
