Thanks Andrew. This looks good now. ;-) BTW: what do the numbers in the "Summary" column mean? For example, for the Revalidation feature it's red and shows "0/5".
Best Matthias Chief Architect 28msec Inc. http://www.28msec.com http://twitter.com/28msec On Sep 16, 2010, at 11:51 PM, Andrew Eisenberg wrote: > > I've updated the reports ... the red has disappeared. Thanks. > > -- Andrew > > -------------------- > Andrew Eisenberg > IBM > 5 Technology Park Drive > Westford, MA 01886 > > [email protected] > Phone: 978-399-5158 > > > > > From: Marian Sorin Nasoi <[email protected]> > To: Andrew Eisenberg/Concord/i...@ibmus > Cc: daniela florescu <[email protected]>, [email protected], zorba-coders > <[email protected]> > Date: 09/16/2010 03:32 AM > Subject: Re: [Zorba-coders] Re: Zorba revision 8827 XQuery/XQueryX > Update Test Suite Results > > > > > Hi Andrew, > > sorry for the misunderstanding: > I have regenerated the reports for XQuery Update and XQueryX Update > test suite for Zorba revision 8827 (http://www.zorba-xquery.com/). > > The results are based on the XQUTS taken from the W3C CVS on September 13, > 2010. > > Thanks for the help, > Sorin > > On 9/15/10, daniela florescu <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sorin, > > > > please regenerate the results with "NOT APPLICABLE" instead of fail. > > Please resend to Andrew after that. > > > > Andrew, I guess this wasn't clear enough for us. > > > > > > Thanks > > Dana > > > > > > On Sep 15, 2010, at 1:38 PM, Andrew Eisenberg wrote: > > > >> > >> > Hi Andrew, > >> > > >> > again thanks for your efforts. > >> > > >> > I looked over the reports and I would have some questions if I may: > >> > > >> > - for 'Minimal Conformance' Saxon EE is shown as passing all the > >> > tests: how is that since for test 'namespace-errors-q16' there is an > >> > opened bug #10432 ? > >> > Zorba reports the alternate result as proposed by Markos and agreed > >> > upon by Michael Kay but since that alternate result is not in > >> XQUTS at > >> > the moment, Zorba reports 'namespace-errors-q16' as failing, which > >> is > >> > the correct thing, right? > >> > Am I missing something here? > >> > >> This too shall pass. I understand your confusion here. We published > >> XQUTS 1.0.1, began collecting results and publishing reports, > >> accepted bug reports, and modified the test suite. Saxon's results > >> were submitted earlier, yours were submitted later. I'm planning to > >> wait until Bug #10432 is resolved and then ask all vendors to > >> resubmit their results. > >> > >> > - for the optional feature 'Update Facility Static Typing Feature' > >> > Zorba mentions that it does not support this feature (see > >> > http://dev.w3.org/2007/xquery-update-10-test-suite/results/ > >> > XQUTSReport.html#features) > >> > yet in the first table of the report Zorba is shown in red (meaning > >> > failed) instead of white (which stands for untested). > >> > Could it be that there is an error in the report generation > >> process here? > >> > I mean shouldn't the tests for a feature that an implementation > >> > mentions it does not support, be shown in white ? > >> > >> The stylesheet that generates the reports uses the pass/fail results > >> that you provide, independent of whether the feature is supported. > >> You could provide a result of "not applicable" or "not tested" > >> instead of "fail", Only "fail" generates the red shading. You could > >> add a comment attribute explaining that the feature is not supported > >> if you wish. > >> > >> > - for the optional feature 'fn:put applied to nodes other than > >> > document and element nodes' there are 4 tests that Zorba 'fails' > >> but > >> > these tests should be run only if the XQuery processor does NOT > >> > support the feature. > >> > Since the tests were created by you, can you please tell us what is > >> > the correct way to handle these tests so that we can correctly show > >> > them as passing? > >> > >> As I said above, you could report a result of "not applicable" or > >> "not tested". You could not generate results for those tests. This > >> looks like what the other products are doing. > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Zorba-coders mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.inf.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/zorba-coders > > > > > [attachment "Zorba_r8827_XQuery(X)_update_results_new.zip" deleted by Andrew > Eisenberg/Concord/IBM] > > _______________________________________________ > Zorba-coders mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.inf.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/zorba-coders
