Copied from the CSSWG list for public record.

2009-10-15 - LCWD published
             http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-css3-background-20091015/
2009-11-17 - LC comment deadline
2009-11-27 - last update to DoC
             http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/csswg/css3-background/issues-lc-2009
2009-12-17 - CR published
             http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-css3-background-20091217/

2010-01-06 - PFWG comment
             http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jan/0109.html
2010-01-06 - Tab responds to PFWG
             http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jan/0112.html
2010-01-20 - Daniel confirms that Tab's response is CSSWG's official position
             http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/wai-liaison/2010Jan/0006.html
2010-02-24 - PFWG responds to Tab
             http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0228.html
2010-02-24 - fantasai responds to PFWG, solicits more information
             http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0229.html
PFWG does not respond

2010-06-23 - return to LCWD
             http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-css3-background-20100612/
2010-07-06 - LC comment deadline
2010-10-21 - last update to DoC
             
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/csswg/css3-background/issues-lc-2010.txt?rev=1.4&content-type=text/plain
2010-10-27 - PFWG comment
             http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0821.html
2010-10-27 - fantasai responds, asks whether edits+answers are satisfactory
             http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0829.html
PFWG does not respond
2010-11-24 - CSSWG resolution to publish (4 weeks later)

Summary:

  1. PFWG's first comment was responded to promptly. It was not recorded
     in the first DoC due to submission after CR was published.
  2. The first comment was not recorded in the second DoC either because I
     had attempted to address all open issues before publishing LC, and
     therefore did not list any comments prior to the LC publication date
     when compiling the DoC.
  2. PFWG's second comment was addressed prompty, but was not recorded in
     the LC issues list due to my oversight.
  3. PFWG did not acknowledge any of my responses or respond to any
     questions therein.

~fantasai
Editor, CSS3 Backgrounds and Borders Module


Reply via email to