Sylvia, -everything +cc: www-archive Thread origin: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011May/thread.html#msg135
Le 10 mai 2011 à 17:32, Silvia Pfeiffer a écrit : > Only in the way that PDF, smil, flash, or any other non-HTML content can be > called "web content". Mixing contents which are completely unrelated. > IMO they are not a native part of the web, but an adjunct and require extra > plugins to work in the Web browser. Then I'm curious to know what are your requirements for the Web. Mine are simple and are three grades. * It has a URI * it has a URI and served through HTTP * It has a URI, served through HTTP and has hypertext capabilities. For example SVG is above PNG as a Web citizen because of its hypertext capabilities. > That you can serve any content from a Web server doesn't make it part of the > Web, only part of the Internet. No. :) To be part of the Web it needs a URI and be served through HTTP. Internet is a total different story. Interesting to see where you are coming from. -- Karl Dubost - http://dev.opera.com/ Developer Relations & Tools, Opera Software
