Yes, I will withdraw the formal objections, but mainly on the basis of your
assurance that, when published, the "This version" link will reflect the
document version currently linked from the poll.
I note that the "This version" links still do not work. My preference and
expectation was that the "This version" link would be available and stabilized
indefinitely from the start of the consensus call.
I'm seeing strange behaviour with the document for poll question 6: "Polyglot
Markup: HTML-Compatible XHTML Documents"
(http://dev.w3.org/html5/html-xhtml-author-guide/html-xhtml-authoring-guide.html)
which sometimes comes up with the old "This version" link. I'm guessing it's a
cacheing issue that will eventually sort itself out.
#g
--
Sam Ruby wrote:
Does this adequately resolve your formal objection?
- Sam Ruby
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Last Call decision poll
Resent-Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 10:13:59 +0000
Resent-From: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 19:11:25 +0900
From: Michael[tm] Smith <[email protected]>
To: Roy T. Fielding <[email protected]>, Julian Reschke
<[email protected]>
CC: [email protected]
Roy, Julian,
To address the problem with responding to the survey that you pointed out,
I've set up static copies of all the drafts for which the chairs are
requesting review:
http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-LC/
http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/drafts/WD-rdfa-in-html-20110524/
http://dev.w3.org/html5/md-LC/
http://dev.w3.org/html5/2dcontext-LC/
http://dev.w3.org/html5/html-xhtml-author-guide/WD-html-polyglot-20110524.htm
http://dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/WD-alt-techniques-20110524.html
Also, I set up temporary redirects so that the links cited in the survey
and in the chairs' "Last Call decision poll" message redirect to the
locations above.
--Mike
