On 06/16/2011 07:03 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 13:33 -0400, Sam Ruby wrote:
On 06/15/2011 12:48 PM, Steve Faulkner wrote:
Hi Sam,
Bijan Parsia has commented on my recent post that
"the current HTMLWG has made these decisions based on consensus is
pretty easy to show false"
I asked him to elucidate and he did
http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2011/06/html5-accessibility-chops-conflicting-advice-and-requirements/comment-page-1/#comment-14653
I can understand if you are not interested in commenting on this, but
would be interested to hear your thoughts
We have forks over items over which there was no objections:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jun/0000.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Mar/0132.html
You don't seem to be replying (in a clear way at least) to Bijan's
point. The point being that evidently there isn't consensus but the lack
of consensus doesn't manifest through W3C procedures.
In those two examples at least, we provided more than ample opportunity
to participate. We also have an agreed to Decision Policy, and a
mechanism to report bugs against same.
- Sam Ruby
