A reply to a private email.
Adrian objected[1] to the current name, I agreed and suggested[2] an
alternative, David Flanagan suggests[3] "WebDOM", I explain[4] why "DOM4"
is better, David seems[5] fine with it. After not hearing anything from
Adrian I complain[6], and he replies[7] not giving any concrete
suggestions other than that "DOM4" might be too unbounded given that the
scope is unclear. I tell[8] him I clarified the scope even more. A little
before Arthur started[9] the organization thread, where Adrian is again
vague[10] and Arthur ends up saying[11] the scope is not clear (which I do
not believe[12] is true as I clarified it mid-August).
Meanwhile I still have not gotten feedback on the proposed name nor how
the "Goals" section does not address the intended scope, but I have gotten
so much wishy washy process email I feel somewhat annoyed.
[1]<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JulSep/0642.html>
[2]<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JulSep/0644.html>
[3]<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JulSep/0663.html>
[4]<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JulSep/0669.html>
[5]<http://twitter.com/__DavidFlanagan/status/99492586250711040>
[6]<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JulSep/0869.html>
[7]<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JulSep/0897.html>
[8]<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JulSep/0910.html>
[9]<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JulSep/thread.html#msg789>
[10]<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JulSep/0896.html>
[11]<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JulSep/1212.html>
[12]<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JulSep/1213.html>
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
