On 1/26/2012 5:12 AM, Steve Faulkner wrote:
hi Jeffe,

Ian has stated in response [1]:

"I follow it, like everyone else, exactly to the extent that I think it
requires us to do the right thing for the Web. When the process requires
us to do something bad for the Web, I ignore it."

I say fair play to him and as long as any other participant in the process can opt out of the process whenever he/she thinks it's "bad for the Web," and the W3C is OK with that, then we have a level playing field for all particpants.

Noone has a free pass to opt out of the process. As I said in [1], there have been exceptions where Ian has not followed the W3C process and we have successfully worked through disagreements. Noone's choice to "opt out" are blithely ignored by the Chairs.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2012Jan/0031.html


but his stament does appear to contradict your statement:

"he agrees to follow the W3C Process"

I don't interpret his statement in the same way you do.

I understand your literal interpretation (since he is not following 100% of the rules all of the time it means he is not following the process). As he says in his response to me [2], it is his view that sometimes he follows it more closely than W3C staff. Since I believe that W3C staff follows the process (possibly with some mistakes), I conclude that Hixie believes he follows the process. As he says in [2], he does not claim to. Nonetheless, he does.

[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2012Jan/0032.html


For people such as myself who have invested a lot of time and energy working within, what is at times a tortuous process, in effecting change to the HTML5 specification, for what I believe to be the 'right thing for the Web'. I don't want to see that work undermined and undone by someone who is in a powerful position, because he or she thinks they own rights on what is the 'right thing for the Web'.

This is a fair concern. If you have specific concerns about your work being "undermined", I hope you are bringing your concerns to the Chairs, to Philippe, and to me.



[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2012Jan/0032.html


best regards

Stevef

On 25 January 2012 23:58, Jeff Jaffe <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    On 1/25/2012 4:53 PM, Steve Faulkner wrote:
    Hi Philippe,

    Ian Hickson wrote: [1]

        On Wed, 25 Jan 2012, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
        >
        > as a reminder, as editor of several documents for the Web
        Applications
        > and HTML Working Group, you agreed to follow the W3C
        Process, as well as
        > following the HTML Decision Policy of the HTML Working
        Group. If this is
        > no longer the case, you should let the Chairs of those
        Groups aware of
        > this,

        The chairs of both groups, as well as yourself, and Jeff, are
        fully aware
        of this already.


    Let me say what I am fully aware of:

    1. Ian has fundamental disagreements with the way that the W3C
    process works.  He has been very clear about that.

    2. Nonetheless, for situations that he is wearing his hat as
    Editor within a W3C Working Group, he agrees to follow the W3C
    Process.  Part of the reason is a mutual desire to have HTML work
    proceed both in W3C (under its process) and WHATWG (under its
    process), and to keep HTML 5 as aligned as possible with HTML LS.

    3. There is already a consensus that some of the points that he
    has made about standardization processes are good points -
    although not for the goals of W3C Working Groups.  Many of these
    points have been adopted for W3C Community Groups which has
    different objectives.

    4. On the whole, the Chairs have reported to me that they are
    satisfied that Ian has fulfilled the commitments (point 2 above)
    to follow the W3C Process.  There have been exceptions which (to
    date) we have successfully worked through.

    5. Ian is so much "bought in" to W3C, that on one occasion where
    he thought the Chairs had made a mistake, he actually escalated
    the Chairs' decision to the W3C CEO.  (nb., after a brief
    discussion between the CEO, Chairs, and Editor - all agreed that
    the Chairs and Editor would resolve the issue and the CEO did not
    enter the HTML 5 Decision Process.)



        --
        Ian Hickson


    So, a working group member who plays a pivotal role does not
    agree to follow the W3C Process, as well as follow the HTML
    Decision Policy of the HTML Working Group.

    Hence Ian has been following the W3C Process.




    Why should any of us?

    regards
    Stevef


    On 25 January 2012 11:39, Steve Faulkner
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Hi Phillippe,


        Ian Hickson wrote [1]:

        "Nobody really follows the W3C process. Some claim to, others
        (such as
        myself) do not. Being on a W3C list certainly doesn't imply
        anything about
        one's actions with respect to the hallowed Process."


        I have acted under the assumption that  participation in
        working groups is dependent on my agreeing to, and attempting
        in good faith, to abide by W3C process, it appears that I and
        others have been mislead.


        [1]
        http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2012Jan/0025.html


-- with regards

        Steve Faulkner
        Technical Director - TPG

        www.paciellogroup.com <http://www.paciellogroup.com> |
        www.HTML5accessibility.com
        <http://www.HTML5accessibility.com> |
        www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner
        <http://www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner>
        HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives -
        dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/
        <http://dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/>
        Web Accessibility Toolbar -
        www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
        <http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html>




-- with regards

    Steve Faulkner
    Technical Director - TPG

    www.paciellogroup.com <http://www.paciellogroup.com> |
    www.HTML5accessibility.com <http://www.HTML5accessibility.com> |
    www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner <http://www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner>
    HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives -
    dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/
    <http://dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/>
    Web Accessibility Toolbar -
    www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
    <http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html>




--
with regards

Steve Faulkner
Technical Director - TPG

www.paciellogroup.com <http://www.paciellogroup.com> | www.HTML5accessibility.com <http://www.HTML5accessibility.com> | www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner <http://www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner> HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives - dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/ <http://dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/> Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
<http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html>

Reply via email to