That sounds fine! Simon
On Feb 15, 2012, at 10:17 AM, L. David Baron wrote: > On Monday 2012-01-30 15:24 +0000, Simon Fraser via cvs-syncmail wrote: >> Update of /sources/public/csswg/css3-animations >> In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv18176 >> >> Modified Files: >> ChangeLog Overview.html Overview.src.html >> Removed Files: >> CSSAnimation.html >> Log Message: >> 2012-01-30 [email protected] >> - Clarify behavior of missing properties in keyframes: >> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14636 >> https://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Tracker/actions/389 > >> Index: Overview.src.html > >> + <p> >> + If property is not specified for a keyframe, or is specified but >> invalid, the animation of that property proceeds >> + as if that keyframe did not exist. Conceptually, it is as if a set >> of keyframes is constructed for each property >> + that is present in any of the keyframes, and an animation is run >> independently for each one. >> + </p> > > Do you mind if I change the "for each one" at the end of this > paragraph to "for each property" just to make it clearer? > > -David > > -- > 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 > 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
