On 10/09/2012 10:22 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Oct 8, 2012, at 2:15 PM, Ian Hickson <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, 8 Oct 2012, Paul Cotton wrote:
Do you wish to maintain this Formal Objection?
Could you please respond to my [email protected] about this Formal
Objection?
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Sep/0225.html
The points raised in the FO still apply, but I'll let the W3C decide
how to deal with it for the HTMLWG deliverable. The problem either is
or will be fixed in the WHATWG version of the spec regardless.
For the sake of clarity: does that mean you still wish to pursue your
Formal Objection or that you wish to withdraw it? i.e. do you want
processing of it via the Formal Objection process to be part of how "the
W3C decide[s] how to deal with it", or would you rather we dealt with it
otherwise?
(I ask because your statement was interpreted in opposite ways by
different people.)
I wish to not be involved in threads regarding the W3C process any more.
Unless we hear otherwise, we will therefore consider this Formal
Objection to be withdrawn.
- Sam Ruby
