-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/15/12 10:25 PM, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote: > Hello Peter, > > On 2012/10/16 7:06, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> On 10/15/12 2:00 PM, Ted Hardie wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Larry >>> Masinter<masin...@adobe.com> wrote: > >>>> My understanding of Peter's survey of other specs that make >>>> reference to RFC 3987 was that there weren't any whose >>>> implementations relied on anything other than the browser to >>>> do URL/IRI resolution and processing. >>>> >>> >>> First, can you provide a pointer to the survey? >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-iri/2012Jul/0060.html >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-iri/2012Jul/0061.html >> >> It was decidedly informal. > > Re. the mail just above, what about xmpp: URIs?
With a few small exceptions, xmpp: URIs are not used natively in XMPP itself because the original Jabber team wasn't very savvy about using URIs everywhere in the protocol (this was in 1998/1999, whereas we didn't define the xmpp: URI scheme until 2005/2006). Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlB9c6YACgkQNL8k5A2w/vxNPQCgklTjdlyxmiXp2JUdFahh5ohi og8AmwUBwfdEUB+XQCJKU2ZioabGE6Ac =vnGk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
